On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:52:40PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Leidinger writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not not possible with current GBDE.
I've patches which allows this here:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Allan Fields writes:
Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to
commit it? ;)
I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority
for me for the time being.
So I am more than happy to see people band together and improve
gbde.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:07:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
+ In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Allan Fields writes:
+
+ Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to
+ commit it? ;)
+
+ I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority
+ for me for the time
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
I'm starting to wonder if we couldn't create one storage-crypto-base
and rewrite gbde, geli on top of it.
Could be, it all depends how much you actually gain from generalizing
common code.
Best way to find out is to try :-)
--
4 matches
Mail list logo
