pe...@taronga.com wrote:
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over instead
of just starting the damn office.
Well, my copy calls this file libosl517li.so, and doing this sed trick on
it just makes it exit without doing anything. Not doing it gives me the
Before running soffice for the first time -- apply the trick
described by Andre Albsmeier on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=432982+436209+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-hackers/19980628.freebsd-hackers
to the freshly installed lib/libosl516li.so
mv
Before running soffice for the first time -- apply the trick
described by Andre Albsmeier on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=432982+436209+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-hackers/19980628.freebsd-hackers
to the freshly installed lib/libosl516li.so
mv
The different results people are having may be a result of the
date of their FreeBSD.
It Works Here[tm] OOTB (setup requires the LD_LIBRARY_PATH set)
with the following
-current of about Aug 22nd
-stable of Aug 26th
-stable of Sep 2nd
-stable of Sep 4th
It does not work here with
-current of
Andre Albsmeier once wrote:
Before running soffice for the first time -- apply the trick
described by Andre Albsmeier on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=432982+436209+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-hackers/19980628.freebsd-hackers
to the freshly installed
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1 OOTB. AFAICT, there's absolutely
no need for this kind
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1 OOTB. AFAICT, there's
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
distribution without any apparent changes to the website. The new changes
broke
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over instead
of just starting the damn office.
I tried it on the new new StarOffice (apparently) (libs ver 517) from Sun.
This fix works for the user that installs it, but when anyone else
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
distribution without any apparent changes to the
jack wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 72192512 Jul 23 11:47 so51_lnx_01.tar
MD5 (so51_lnx_01.tar) = 347ffa68be6c1d7b89fd843591afb0d3
so51a_lnx_01.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jacko user 70393856 Aug 31 15:47 so51a_lnx_01.tar
(libs are all libxxx517x.so)
requires jumping throught the hoops
Today Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stabl
e is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
"Andrew J. Korty" wrote:
If it helps, I don't think you really need to unzip setup.zip. I
found that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. makes the setup program run
just fine (because it actually does unzip setup.zip, but into a
subdirectory of /tmp).
Exactly what I always needed to do. It can't
jack wrote:
Today Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable is
not recent?
The fact that soffice runs setup again and again depend to a missing
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
jack wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 72192512 Jul 23 11:47 so51_lnx_01.tar
MD5 (so51_lnx_01.tar) = 347ffa68be6c1d7b89fd843591afb0d3
so51a_lnx_01.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jacko user 70393856 Aug 31 15:47 so51a_lnx_01.tar
(libs are
According to Vince Vielhaber:
There was a patch posted on the freebsd.misc newsgroup the other day for
I re-posted the patch for people not running -STABLE yes.
procfs that eliminates the need for the "hackery". It's supposed to be
already in -current and I don't recall if it's supposed to
Andre Albsmeier once wrote:
Before running soffice for the first time -- apply the trick
described by Andre Albsmeier on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=432982+436209+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-hackers/19980628.freebsd-hackers
to the freshly installed
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Andre Albsmeier once wrote:
Before running soffice for the first time -- apply the trick
described by Andre Albsmeier on
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=432982+436209+/usr/local/www/db/text/1998/freebsd-hackers/19980628.freebsd-hackers
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1 OOTB. AFAICT, there's absolutely
no need for this kind of
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1 OOTB.
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is everybody doing? I run SO5.1 OOTB. AFAICT, there's
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar once wrote:
I don't think this one is needed anymore ?!?
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over
instead of just starting the damn office.
What is
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
distribution without any apparent changes to the website. The new changes
broke things.
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
It is. Without it, soffice keeps bringing up setup over and over instead
of just starting the damn office.
I tried it on the new new StarOffice (apparently) (libs ver 517) from Sun.
This fix works for the user that installs it, but when anyone else
bro...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
distribution without any apparent changes to
Today Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
bro...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stable
is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to the
jack wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 72192512 Jul 23 11:47 so51_lnx_01.tar
MD5 (so51_lnx_01.tar) = 347ffa68be6c1d7b89fd843591afb0d3
so51a_lnx_01.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jacko user 70393856 Aug 31 15:47 so51a_lnx_01.tar
(libs are all libxxx517x.so)
requires jumping throught the hoops
Today Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
bro...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your -stabl
e is
not recent?
Is this true for BOTH versions of the tarball? Changes where made to
Andrew J. Korty wrote:
If it helps, I don't think you really need to unzip setup.zip. I
found that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. makes the setup program run
just fine (because it actually does unzip setup.zip, but into a
subdirectory of /tmp).
Exactly what I always needed to do. It can't find
jack wrote:
Today Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
bro...@one-eyed-alien.net wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
SO5.1 installs OOTB on both -current and -stable. I suspect your
-stable is
not recent?
The fact that soffice runs setup again and again depend to a
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
jack wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 72192512 Jul 23 11:47 so51_lnx_01.tar
MD5 (so51_lnx_01.tar) = 347ffa68be6c1d7b89fd843591afb0d3
so51a_lnx_01.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jacko user 70393856 Aug 31 15:47 so51a_lnx_01.tar
(libs are all
According to Vince Vielhaber:
There was a patch posted on the freebsd.misc newsgroup the other day for
I re-posted the patch for people not running -STABLE yes.
procfs that eliminates the need for the hackery. It's supposed to be
already in -current and I don't recall if it's supposed to be
With relatively small amount of hackery, the StarOffice51 for Linux can
be forced to run on FreeBSD. Both, the setup and the office itself.
To run setup, you need to unzip the setup.zip (with the -L flag) and
make all the libraries there known to the ld-linux.so. (I just added a
new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
With relatively small amount of hackery, the StarOffice51 for Linux can
be forced to run on FreeBSD. Both, the setup and the office itself.
[snip]
If Sun doesn't release the sources this month, I'll submit a port...
I for
With relatively small amount of hackery, the StarOffice51 for Linux can
be forced to run on FreeBSD. Both, the setup and the office itself.
To run setup, you need to unzip the setup.zip (with the -L flag) and
make all the libraries there known to the ld-linux.so. (I just added a
new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
With relatively small amount of hackery, the StarOffice51 for Linux can
be forced to run on FreeBSD. Both, the setup and the office itself.
[snip]
If Sun doesn't release the sources this month, I'll submit a port...
I for
wwo...@cybcon.com once wrote:
Woulden't a port be the better option though? There are ports of Linux
based Netscape...
It would be, but I only have so much time. And if the source is
available, I'd rather spend it poking around it. Or poke around
something else (like
39 matches
Mail list logo
