On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in Unix Network
Programming, v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
case differently.
My section 20.3 is on UDP Datagram Trunctation...did you mean 17.3
(Routing Sockets:
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 05:03 PM, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote:
It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in Unix Network
Programming, v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this
case differently.
My section 20.3 is on UDP
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote:
configured I get a RTM_NEWADDR message. The bit I'm confused with is the
struct sockaddr associated with RTA_IFA (that I assumed would hold the IP
of the interface) has an sa_family value of AF_IMPLINK. If I cast it to a
struct sockaddr_in then s_addr is
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote:
but it seems that if I don't read the packet with one read call then the
packet is lost. Is this correct behaviour? I guess if the buffer is small
Well it seems that if you dont get the entire packet in one read it is
lost forever. It also seems that no
On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 08:03 AM, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Andrew wrote:
but it seems that if I don't read the packet with one read call then
the
packet is lost. Is this correct behaviour? I guess if the buffer is
small
Well it seems that if you dont get the entire
5 matches
Mail list logo