On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:16:59 +0200
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:38:32 Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 10/9/09, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program run?
Yes, just run gdb /path/to/program and type run.
[...] sudo *sometimes* segfaults [...] However, it doesn't dump
Mel Flynn wrote:
[1] In order to get this working I had to put a statically compiled ps in the
jail
This is a pretty standard practice. I always put these statically built
into any jails that don't match the outside system. I use the following
crunchgen config to accomplish that.
Cheers,
On Friday 09 October 2009 11:38:29 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program run?
Yes, just run gdb /path/to/program and type run.
On Friday 09 October 2009 16:50:04 Mel Flynn wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 11:38:29 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
[...] sudo *sometimes* segfaults [...] However, it doesn't dump core
sudo(1) is setuid root. You need to set
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Mel Flynn wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 11:38:29 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program run?
Yes, just run
On Friday 09 October 2009 16:50:04 Mel Flynn wrote:
On Friday 09 October 2009 11:38:29 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Yes, just run gdb /path/to/program and type run.
Not what I was looking for. The segfaults are random and the only way to
somewhat reliably reproduce it is to have portmaster invoke it as
Nate Eldredge n...@thatsmathematics.com writes:
This won't work. You can't debug setuid programs (for reasons which
should be obvious).
Ah, true, but easily fixable. Add a sysctl for it (just copy-paste the
declaration for kern.sugid_coredump and change the name) and check its
value in
On Friday 09 October 2009 21:27:21 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Yes, just run gdb /path/to/program and type run.
Not what I was looking for. The segfaults are random and the only way to
Hi,
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program run?
Why I'd like this is the following:
I've got a i386 jail on an amd64 box, running 7.2-p4. UNAME_p and UNAME_m have
been set to i386 as well as ARCH in /etc/make.conf. Running
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:38:32 Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 10/9/09, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.hack...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to have a program run through gdb and gdb only record a
segfault, but otherwise let the program run?
Why I'd like this is the following:
12 matches
Mail list logo
