Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Hi all,
This weekend I decided to do some assembly hacking on some object-only code
that I've lost the C source for. Since I haven't coded assembler for at
least 8 years, and I threw my x86 assembly manuals out when I moved 6 months
ago, there are a few things
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:08:58PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
In particular, am I interpreting these instructions correctly?
0x80839fb uttstrbyt+43: movzbl (%edx,%eax,1),%eax
Takes %eax + %edx, obtains the byte value in memory at that address,
zero-extends and places into %eax
On 27-Oct-01 Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Hi all,
This weekend I decided to do some assembly hacking on some object-only code
that I've lost the C source for. Since I haven't coded assembler for at
least 8 years, and I threw my x86 assembly manuals out when I moved 6 months
ago, there are a
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:21:33AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Almost. The '2' there is a multiplier on (I think) %eax, so it uses
'ebx + 2 * eax + 0xe90' for the memory address. Either that or 'eax +
2 * ebx + 0xe90'. Check the gas info page for the ATT syntax to
figure out exactly which.
Hi all,
This weekend I decided to do some assembly hacking on some object-only code
that I've lost the C source for. Since I haven't coded assembler for at
least 8 years, and I threw my x86 assembly manuals out when I moved 6 months
ago, there are a few things that are stumping me.
In
5 matches
Mail list logo