On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
jackd (audio/jack) creates a directory in /tmp with a UNIX domain socket in
it. Clients connect to this socket to communicate with the server.
We currently support the sharing of UNIX domain sockets between file system
layers on either
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication is
unix domain sockets?
It is a security problem. I think the long-term solution would be to add a
sysctl analogous to security.jail.param.securelevel to handle this.
I don't think
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Linda Messerschmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
is unix domain sockets?
It is a security problem. I think the long-term solution would be to add a
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
jackd (audio/jack) creates a directory in /tmp with a UNIX domain socket in
it. Clients connect to this socket to communicate with the server.
We currently support the sharing of UNIX domain
2009/12/10 Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Linda Messerschmidt wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
is unix domain sockets?
It is a security problem. I
On 10 Dec 2009, at 09:59, Ivan Voras wrote:
You have a point there. I was actually thinking more of sysvshm -
which doesn't have anything to do with any of the issues here - but
has some of the same properties (and is also used by databases - e.g.
postgresql, which I'm using daily so it sort
Quoting Julian Elischer jul...@elischer.org (from Wed, 02 Dec 2009
09:43:25 -0800):
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Linda Messerschmidt linda.messerschm...@gmail.com (from
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:22:02 -0500):
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's
Quoting Linda Messerschmidt linda.messerschm...@gmail.com (from Tue,
1 Dec 2009 10:22:02 -0500):
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
is unix domain sockets?
It is a security problem. I
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Linda Messerschmidt linda.messerschm...@gmail.com (from Tue, 1
Dec 2009 10:22:02 -0500):
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
is unix domain sockets?
Quoting Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org (from Mon, 30 Nov 2009
16:14:40 +0100):
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL,
/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 }
76030 initial
On 2009-12-01 09:32:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
My workaround with MySQL is to have the jail and the socket in the
same FS (I would prefer to have them on separate FS). Then you can do
a hardlink of the socket into the jail (obviously after each restart
of the software, but this can
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication
is unix domain sockets?
It is a security problem. I think the long-term solution would be to add a
sysctl analogous to security.jail.param.securelevel
jackd (audio/jack) creates a directory in /tmp with a UNIX domain socket
in it. Clients connect to this socket to communicate with the server.
$ jackd -d oss -r 44100 -p 128
$ ls -alF /tmp/jack-11001/default
total 4
drwx-- 2 xw wheel 512 30 Nov 14:19 ./
drwx-- 3 xw wheel 512 30 Nov
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
jackd (audio/jack) creates a directory in /tmp with a UNIX domain socket
in it. Clients connect to this socket to communicate with the server.
$ jackd -d oss -r 44100 -p 128
$ ls -alF /tmp/jack-11001/default
total 4
drwx-- 2 xw wheel 512 30 Nov 14:19 ./
On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL,
/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 }
76030 initial thread NAMI /tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0
76030 initial thread RET connect -1 errno 61 Connection
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL,
/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 }
76030 initial thread NAMI /tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0
76030 initial thread RET connect
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL,
/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 }
76030 initial thread NAMI /tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0
17 matches
Mail list logo
