On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
the really safe way of course it to make a 6.0 chroot on your machine and
compile your app there.
For raw UNIX applications,
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
For raw UNIX applications, this rule of thumb
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything exotic then you will probably be safe.
For raw
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:50:48 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
basically if you rely only on the standard posix interfaces and don't do
anything
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent minor releases of the same major release?
In
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent minor releases of the
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both
Daniel Eischen wrote:
Binaries compiled on a certain version of FreeBSD will continue to run
on later versions, but are not guaranteed to run on earlier versions
(and in fact *will* not run depending on the binary). This is because
over time the system libraries and kernel grow new features
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both previous and subsequent
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
both
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Carl Shapiro wrote:
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form of ABI compatibility
Carl Shapiro wrote:
If my binary only executes system calls indirectly through libc
interfaces, as far as libc and libm are concerned, are new symbols the
only thing I need to worry about?
I think so, yes.
Kris
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Carl Shapiro wrote:
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form
Carl Shapiro wrote:
Kris Julian
Thank you for clarifiying the compatibility situation. This
information was exactly what I was looking for.
I have a follow-up question based on this remark...
On 5/5/08, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we don't attempt to keep this form of
FreeBSD Hackers,
I have a general question about the compatibility of FreeBSD binaries
within major releases. If I build a binary for a given release of
FreeBSD can I make a reasonable guarantee that the binary will run on
As a datapoint, I have been using cistron-radiusd for
16 matches
Mail list logo
