On 2009-Jan-28 11:24:21 -0800, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On a mac, cc -m64 builds 64 bit binaries and cc -m32 builds
32 bit binaries. The following script makes it as easy to do
so on a 64 bit FreeBSD -- at least on the few programs I
tried. Ideally the right magic needs to be folded
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:44:00 +1100 Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au
wrote:
On 2009-Jan-28 11:24:21 -0800, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On a mac, cc -m64 builds 64 bit binaries and cc -m32 builds
32 bit binaries. The following script makes it as easy to do
so on a 64 bit
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:51:28 EST John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 3:16:33 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:11:24AM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 2:24:21 pm Bakul Shah wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:51:28 EST John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 3:16:33 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:11:24AM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy
On Friday 21 December 2007 3:16:33 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:11:24AM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
The default setting of the x87 floating point control
On 12/20/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is an oversight. See the thread beginning
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/037947.html
Thanks for the pointer into the -stable mailing list.
The incorrect precision control bits is a serious
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 03:09:33AM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
On 12/20/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is an oversight. See the thread beginning
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/037947.html
Thanks for the pointer into the -stable
Carl Shapiro wrote:
On 12/20/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is an oversight. See the thread beginning
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/037947.html
Thanks for the pointer into the -stable mailing list.
The incorrect precision control
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
The default setting of the x87 floating point control word on the i386
port is 0x127F. Among other things, this value sets the precision
control to double precision. The default setting of the
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:11:24AM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
The default setting of the x87 floating point control word on the i386
port is 0x127F. Among other things, this value sets the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
The default setting of the x87 floating point control word on the i386
port is 0x127F. Among other things, this value sets the precision
control to double precision. The default setting of the x87 floating
point control word on the
Developers,
There is a critical incompatibility between the floating point
environment of the 32-bit compatibility environment of AMD64 systems
and a genuine i386 system.
The default setting of the x87 floating point control word on the i386
port is 0x127F. Among other things, this value sets
12 matches
Mail list logo
