Re: device naming convention

2000-09-20 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Marc Tardif wrote: 0cicuta/home/babolo(9)#dd of=/dev/wd0s2 if=/dev/zero bs=660b 1cicuta/home/babolo(11)#od -b /dev/wd0s2 [ snip ] Why I use 2.2.7 for test? Because of my lovely 4.1-STABLE is extremly unstable with content of ad0s2 (wd0s2) above and silently reboot

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-19 Thread Aleksandr A.Babaylov
Marc Tardif writes: What is slices content? s1 - almost right FreeBSD label s2 - not a right FreeBSD label but similar enough to label. s3 - no label or similar at all. How to do such a content that screw the system? This is my way for this test: - shorten s2 to 3 cilinder. -

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Marc Tardif wrote: What is the FreeBSD naming convention for devices of disk slices and labels? Considering my system is installed on the first partition of /dev/wd0 (non-dedicated), these are the block-device interfaces I have to my disk: wd0 wd0cwd0fwd0s1 wd0s1c

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Marc Tardif wrote: If I understand correctly, wd0[a-h] will be the same as wd0s3[a-h] in a situation where DOS is on first slice, Linux on second and FreeBSD on third, right? But what if the fourth slice is also FreeBSD? In such a Right. case, I'll assume you meant "booted slice" instead

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Tue 2000-09-19 (00:54), Daniel C. Sobral wrote: Lastly, where else could I have found this information other than asking on the FreeBSD mailing list? Beats me, but it _should_ be in the handbook. A basic device naming overview, as well as some simple disk layout information, is

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Marc Tardif
[ snip ] Assuming /dev/wd0s2 contains a few blocks, ie /dev/wd0s1 doesn't span to the end of disk: 4. If I want to use /dev/wd0s2 as a raw slice for reading and writing, what are the steps to follow? None. You just use it. This is what I have in fdisk (from /stand/sysinstall):

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Mon 2000-09-18 (14:42), Marc Tardif wrote: 4b. Should I then be using /dev/rwd0s2 or /dev/rwd0s2a for reading and writing (of course, this is assuming block i/o of multiples of 512 bytes)? Nope, using raw devices is almost always wrong, and we even got rid of raw device

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Marc Tardif wrote: This is what I have in fdisk (from /stand/sysinstall): Offset SizeEnd Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62- 6 unused0 6319375651937627wd0s1 3freebsd 165 C

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Marc Tardif
This is what I have in fdisk (from /stand/sysinstall): Offset SizeEnd Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62- 6 unused0 6319375651937627wd0s1 3freebsd 165 C 1937628 191268

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Sep-00 Marc Tardif wrote: This is what I have in fdisk (from /stand/sysinstall): Offset SizeEnd Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62- 6 unused0 6319375651937627wd0s1 3freebsd

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Aleksandr A.Babaylov
Daniel C. Sobral writes: Marc Tardif wrote: 4. If I want to use /dev/wd0s2 as a raw slice for reading and writing, what are the steps to follow? You can't write several blocks near /dev/wd0s2 beginning. Use /dev/wd0 with proper address That is rather risky. Wouldn't it be

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-18 Thread Marc Tardif
0cicuta/home/babolo(9)#dd of=/dev/wd0s2 if=/dev/zero bs=660b 1cicuta/home/babolo(11)#od -b /dev/wd0s2 [ snip ] Why I use 2.2.7 for test? Because of my lovely 4.1-STABLE is extremly unstable with content of ad0s2 (wd0s2) above and silently reboot after the first dd in the test above.

device naming convention

2000-09-16 Thread Marc Tardif
What is the FreeBSD naming convention for devices of disk slices and labels? Considering my system is installed on the first partition of /dev/wd0 (non-dedicated), these are the block-device interfaces I have to my disk: wd0 wd0cwd0fwd0s1 wd0s1cwd0s1fwd0s2 wd0awd0d

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-16 Thread Aleksandr A.Babaylov
Marc Tardif writes: What is the FreeBSD naming convention for devices of disk slices and labels? Considering my system is installed on the first partition of /dev/wd0 (non-dedicated), these are the block-device interfaces I have to my disk: wd0 wd0cwd0fwd0s1 wd0s1c

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-16 Thread Marc Tardif
[ snip ] 1. What are wd0[a-h] used for? For wd0sN[a-h] where N is number of first slice recognized as FreeBSD slice If I understand correctly, wd0[a-h] will be the same as wd0s3[a-h] in a situation where DOS is on first slice, Linux on second and FreeBSD on third, right? But what if the

Re: device naming convention

2000-09-16 Thread Aleksandr A.Babaylov
Marc Tardif writes: [ snip ] 1. What are wd0[a-h] used for? For wd0sN[a-h] where N is number of first slice recognized as FreeBSD slice If I understand correctly, wd0[a-h] will be the same as wd0s3[a-h] in a situation where DOS is on first slice, Linux on second and FreeBSD on