on 12/11/2010 01:08 Stanislav Sedov said the following:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net mentioned:
Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a ping.
I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to use
that
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:14:47 +0200
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org mentioned:
Just to let you know that I am eagerly awaiting for that to happen.
Perhaps even could help with something if you'd need that.
Review can certainly help.:-)
Can I send you the patch?
Thanks!
--
Stanislav Sedov
on 12/11/2010 15:58 Stanislav Sedov said the following:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:14:47 +0200
Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org mentioned:
Just to let you know that I am eagerly awaiting for that to happen.
Perhaps even could help with something if you'd need that.
Review can certainly help.:-)
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little bit
of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only called from
kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd is not ALIVE.
The only consumer in
On Thu, 11.11.2010 at 13:16:39 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little bit
of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only called from
kvm_deadprocs which is only
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:41:52 pm Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi,
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little
bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only
called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd
is not
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net mentioned:
Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a ping.
I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to use
that
library or not, but crashdump support is a key goal
Hi,
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little
bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only
called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd
is not ALIVE.
The only consumer in our tree that I can make out is *probably*
On 2010-11-10 21:41, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
But, the kgdb file gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/kvm-fbsd.c, where
kvm_getprocs is probably called on a dead kernel is not even used during
build!
So I guess I'm staring at dead code here, any kvm people around that can
clue me in?
In
On 11/10/10 12:41 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Hi,
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little
bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only
called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd
is not ALIVE.
The only consumer
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:41:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little
bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only
called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd
is not ALIVE.
11 matches
Mail list logo