On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:14:22AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:44:18PM +0900 I heard the voice of
Pyun YongHyeon, and lo! it spake thus:
Yes, it could be. But I think the machine is fast enough to read
sequential blocks.
Try running it without SMP.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:44:18PM +0900 I heard the voice of
Pyun YongHyeon, and lo! it spake thus:
Yes, it could be. But I think the machine is fast enough to read
sequential blocks.
Try running it without SMP. There may be enough happening in the MP
locking bit that you end up falling
Hi,
I encountered a P3 SMP system that shows poor fdc(4) performance.
But when I use larger block size, say 36b, it seems it works
as expected.
#dd if=boot.flp of=/dev/fd0
2880+0 records in
2880+0 records out
1474560 bytes transferred in 607.483808 secs (2427 bytes/sec)
#dd if=boot.flp of=/dev
On Sat, 2005-Nov-12 16:18:15 +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I encountered a P3 SMP system that shows poor fdc(4) performance.
But when I use larger block size, say 36b, it seems it works
as expected.
36b is one track. My suspicion is that the system isn't fast enough
to read sequential blocks, one
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:37:11PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-Nov-12 16:18:15 +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
I encountered a P3 SMP system that shows poor fdc(4) performance.
But when I use larger block size, say 36b, it seems it works
as expected.
36b is one track. My
5 matches
Mail list logo
