scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Andrew Lankford
While we're talking about recent MFC's for SATA hardware (works for me, but I still need the old ata drivers for my cdrom), is anyone out there really still using the mcd (fbsd 1.0 vintage) and scd (2.0.5) drivers? ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Lankford wrote: While we're talking about recent MFC's for SATA hardware (works for me, but I still need the old ata drivers for my cdrom), is anyone out there really still using the mcd (fbsd 1.0 vintage) and scd (2.0.5) drivers? mcd and scd are ISA

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread perryh
Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: mcd and scd are ISA-only devices ... They were important for the 386 (now not supported) and 486 machines. Since the 486 machines in question maxed out at 32MB, and 8.x has trouble running in 32MB on x86, I'm guessing there aren't too many 486 SX/DX

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 23, 2011, at 5:19 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: mcd and scd are ISA-only devices ... They were important for the 386 (now not supported) and 486 machines. Since the 486 machines in question maxed out at 32MB, and 8.x has trouble running in 32MB

Fwd: Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Andrew Lankford
) with ESMTP id p3NNbvwt006040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:37:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from i...@bsdimp.com) Subject:Re: scd and mcd Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary