Re: vmnet (was: Linux ioctl not implemented error)

1999-12-07 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vladimir N. Silyaev) writes: are need to have steal nerves. I fill that, at the time when I was porting vmware. I have too much hours of very interested work - load driver, launch vmware and then looking into the DDB double fault screen. Reload box, and then again. I

Re: vmnet (was: Linux ioctl not implemented error)

1999-12-07 Thread Vladimir N. Silyaev
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote: are need to have steal nerves. I fill that, at the time when I was porting vmware. I have too much hours of very interested work - load driver, launch vmware and then looking into the DDB double fault screen. Reload

Re: vmnet (was: Linux ioctl not implemented error)

1999-12-03 Thread Vladimir N. Silyaev
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:02:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I don't know. At any case we are need provide the same API as linux vmnet provide, so we are need to implement it in the kernel module. But bochs use user level implementation. It does have some limitations (can't send

vmnet (was: Linux ioctl not implemented error)

1999-12-02 Thread Vladimir N. Silyaev
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has Peter Grehan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on the copyright so he'd be the one to contact

Re: vmnet (was: Linux ioctl not implemented error)

1999-12-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Vladimir N. Silyaev wrote: On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has Peter Grehan ([EMAIL