i come across this unusual problem.
i changed the ip_tos field of the struct ip and
computed
the checksum by using in_cksum().
when the packet uses only one mbuf the computed
checksum is ok but when the packet uses more than one
mbuf then the computed checksum is wrong.
eg. pinging with payloa
On 2005-10-23 01:30, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i come across this unusual problem.
>
> i changed the ip_tos field of the struct ip and computed the checksum
> by using in_cksum().
>
> when the packet uses only one mbuf the computed checksum is ok but
> when the packet uses more than one
> > i changed the ip_tos field of the struct ip and
> computed the checksum
> > by using in_cksum().
> >
> > when the packet uses only one mbuf the computed
> checksum is ok but
> > when the packet uses more than one mbuf then the
> computed checksum is
> > wrong.
>
> Note that the IP header conta
On 2005-10-23 04:13, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /* the argument m is the (struct mbuf *) that
> * contains the packet data
> */
>
> void copy_the_memorybuffer(struct mbuf **m)
> {
>struct mbuf *mbuf_pointer=*m;
>struct mbuf **next_packet;
>
>next_packet=&mbuf_pointer;
>
>
this is the second round of tests, the driver is cleaner, handles
multiple LUN's ok, and can handle big (256) tagged opening.
so far it's been tested on
OS: FreeBSD-5.4/6.0 both intel & amd64, UP & SMP
targets: NetAPP, Intransa, SanRAD, Cisco, Promise, Equallogic
still missing:
At about the time of 10/20/2005 4:04 AM, Bernd Walter stated the following:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:38:45PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
>>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>:
>>: When the umass driver is compiled into the kernel, and on
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 07:34:45PM -0700, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> At about the time of 10/20/2005 4:04 AM, Bernd Walter stated the following:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:38:45PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> >>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
Consider the following code fragment:
(segment 2)
Calling code section:
/* get devinfo root nexus */
printf("root ptr: %p\n", root);
result = usb_devinfo_root(&root);
printf("root ptr: %p\n", root);
if (result < 0)
{
usb_devinfo_close();
return(-1);
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:08:40AM +0900, Sangwoo Shim wrote:
> Actually the first thing that I do after minimal installing of new system is
> to install vim from the ports tree. (in fact, installing cvsup, of course :-)
> I remember once upon a time someone (david?) made a suggestion that nvi in
>
> > void copy_the_memorybuffer(struct mbuf **m)
> > {
> >struct mbuf *mbuf_pointer=*m;
> >struct mbuf **next_packet;
> >
> >next_packet=&mbuf_pointer;
> >
> >struct ip *my_ip_hdr;
> >my_ip_hdr=mtod((*next_packet),struct ip *);
> >my_ip_hdr->ip_tos=64;
> >my_ip_hdr->ip_s
> > void copy_the_memorybuffer(struct mbuf **m)
> > {
> >struct mbuf *mbuf_pointer=*m;
> >struct mbuf **next_packet;
> >
> >next_packet=&mbuf_pointer;
> >
> >struct ip *my_ip_hdr;
> >my_ip_hdr=mtod((*next_packet),struct ip *);
> >my_ip_hdr->ip_tos=64;
> >my_ip_hdr->ip_s
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 07:03:25AM +0200 I heard the voice of
Andreas Klemm, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Most favourite example:
> I personally still get mad if it comes to the "u" undo key.
I miss :N. You have to :split and then :n separately.
> Standard vi lets you toggle your last change by
12 matches
Mail list logo
