Hi.
I'm running 8.1 on my Sony Vaio laptop, with dwm as window manager on
lastest Xorg on ports.
When I'm trying to run firefox3, the system freezes unexpectly. I
know that freezes is a bit generic but I can't find a more specific
term to describe the situation. Dmesg doesn't give useful infos.
I
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/10 10:18 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
Hi.
I'm running 8.1 on my Sony Vaio laptop, with dwm as window manager on
lastest Xorg on ports.
When I'm trying to run firefox3, the system freezes unexpectly. I
know
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/10 10:18 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
Hi.
I'm
Ok. How about this?
Firefox items:
1. What version of Firefox are you using?
Firefox 3.6.4. Lastest from ports, compiled now.
2. Are you using any Firefox plugins?
Yes, Xmarks.
3. When you try to bring up Firefox, does it start to render the GTK
window and then freeze, or does it
removing ~/.mozilla works fine. I think that problem's related to
add-on Xmarks I've been installer or to Restore session
functionality
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
On 31/08/10 07:53, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2010 12:45:40 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
removing ~/.mozilla works fine. I think that problem's related to
add-on Xmarks I've been installer
(some kind of guidance) to continue
this project. If someone is interested to help, it would be very
appreciated.
Best
Davide Italiano
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
oh, sorry I noticed that there's a typo.
In mtx_init(uma_mtx, Bitmap Lock, NULL, MTX_DEF);
you should replace uma_mtx with bitmap_mtx.
Davide
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
It seems that today I've some good news.
I've done some job.
Before I tried stuffs userspace
http://davit.altervista.org/malloc_new.c , then I improved my patch a
bit http://davit.altervista.org/uma_large_allocations.patch )
So, the situation is follow. System starts (before it doesn't), but
I've
2011/10/2 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
Here are several memory-allocation mechanisms in the kernel. The two
I'm aware of is MALLOC_DEFINE()/malloc()/free() and uma_* (zone(9)).
As far as I understand, malloc() is general-purpose, but it has
fixed transaction
2011/10/2 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Davide.
You wrote 2 октября 2011 г., 16:57:48:
But what if I need to allocate a lot (say, 16K-32K) of page-sized
blocks? Not in one chunk, for sure, but in lifetime of my kernel
module. Which allocator should I use? It seems, the best one
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Davide.
You wrote 2 октября 2011 г., 18:00:26:
BTW, I/O is often require big buffers, up to MAXPHYS (128KiB for
now), do you mean, that any allocation of such memory has
considerable performance penalties,
Was the node you're removing actually part of the tree?
I had a similar issue some time ago because I've tried insert two
nodes w/ the same key and then remove then.
In practice, the second INSERT operation failed (due to the definition
of key in a BST), and so I was trying to remove a node that
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
I might just be also interested to review/comment code, discuss
regressions, and architecture, for a change ;-)
Unfortunately, such threads
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Paul Albrecht albre...@glccom.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about this repost but I'm confused about the responses I received
in my last post so I'm looking for some clarification.
Specifically, I though I could use the kqueue timer as essentially a
drop in
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:00:47 pm Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Albrecht
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:08:47 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:57:16 am Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 08:34 -0400
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Paul Albrecht albre...@glccom.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 07:22 -0500, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:08:47 am Davide Italiano wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:26
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
So I configured a kernel with the following option:
options KTR_ENTRIES=(1024UL*1024)
then booted the kernel and did
$ sysctl debug.ktr.clear=1
and got an insta-reboot.
No panic, nothing, just a reset.
I suspect
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
I am trying to understand if it is possible to allow memory allocations
(M_NOWAIT,
of course) in a spinlock context.
I do not see any obvious architectural obstacles.
But the fact that all of the uma locks, system map
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Prodded by davide@, I'd like to collect opinions about raising the
vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage sysctl from 5 to 60, committed at:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254986
What it does:
Used in lowmem handler
What would perhaps be better than a hardcoded reclaim age would be to use
an LRU-type approach and perhaps set a target percent to reclaim. That is,
suppose you were to reclaim the oldest 10% of hashes on each lowmem call
(and make the '10%' the tunable value). Then you will always make some
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/
GENERIC. See how it behaves.
I've successfully done buildworlds on 10-i386 with 128mb RAM. Let's try not
to break that before
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say, 128mb w/
GENERIC. See how it behaves.
I've successfully done
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:32:58 +0200
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Adrian,
Please try it out on a -10 VM with something RAM limited - say,
128mb
27 matches
Mail list logo
