On 07.11.2012 08:45, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/11/07 14:17, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/11/06 19:03, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 9/20/12, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
I found another scenario in taskqueue, in the function
taskqueue_terminate, current
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/11/06 19:03, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 9/20/12, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012/09/18 22:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully
loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462
On 10/29/12, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 20/09/2012 16:14 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/20/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/20/12, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012/09/18 22:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully
loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread, id:Xorg tid
102818,
state:running, attributes:
On 2012/11/06 19:03, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 9/20/12, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012/09/18 22:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully
loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread, id:Xorg tid
On 2012/11/07 14:17, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/11/06 19:03, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 9/20/12, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012/09/18 22:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully
loaded
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 20/09/2012 16:14 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/20/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
The patch works well as far as I can tell. Thank you!
There is one warning with full witness enables but it appears
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 20/09/2012 16:14 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/20/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
The patch works well as far as I can tell.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
[ trimm ]
This also let me wonder about the tdq_lowpri check in the self case,
in general. Basically it forces sched_pickcpu() to select self if and
only if the new thread to schedule has an higher priority than the
on 20/09/2012 16:14 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/20/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
The patch works well as far as I can tell. Thank you!
There is one warning with full witness enables but it appears to be harmless
(so
far):
Andriy,
thanks a lot for your testing
On 2012/09/18 22:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread, id:Xorg tid 102818,
state:running, attributes: prio:122
136793 0 3670427870241000 KTRGRAPH group:thread,
on 19/09/2012 10:33 Attilio Rao said the following:
It is hard for me to tell if this is subject to same issues because I
do not entirely understand where the locking was happening in your
patch.
Can you try testing this with your already KTR instrumented test and
possibly report?
The patch
on 20/09/2012 14:04 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 19/09/2012 10:33 Attilio Rao said the following:
It is hard for me to tell if this is subject to same issues because I
do not entirely understand where the locking was happening in your
patch.
Can you try testing this with your already
on 20/09/2012 14:04 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 19/09/2012 10:33 Attilio Rao said the following:
It is hard for me to tell if this is subject to same issues because I
do not entirely understand where the locking was happening in your
patch.
Can you try testing this with your already
On 9/20/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 19/09/2012 10:33 Attilio Rao said the following:
It is hard for me to tell if this is subject to same issues because I
do not entirely understand where the locking was happening in your
patch.
Can you try testing this with your already KTR
on 19/09/2012 02:01 Attilio Rao said the following:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 18/09/2012 19:50 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 19/09/2012 02:01 Attilio Rao said the following:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 18/09/2012 19:50 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread, id:Xorg tid 102818,
state:running, attributes: prio:122
136793 0 3670427870241000 KTRGRAPH
on 18/09/2012 19:50 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread, id:Xorg tid 102818,
state:running,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/09/2012 19:50 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0 3670427870244462 KTRGRAPH group:thread,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 18/09/2012 19:50 Attilio Rao said the following:
On 9/18/12, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Here is a snippet that demonstrates the issue on a supposedly fully loaded
2-processor system:
136794 0
21 matches
Mail list logo
