Hi Borodin,
Please make a PR, attach your patch and assign it to USB so that it does not
get lost.
--HPS
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Borodin Oleg wrote:
Patch for correct determine work uplcom with R232-USB Profilic
PL2303HX chips
Borodin Oleg
Kaliningrad, Russia
---
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:27:26PM +0200, MeX wrote:
Hello,
On Str, Október 15, 2008 15:15, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Are you using the Matrix Storage Technology? If so, immediately stop.
FreeBSD's support for this is very, very bad, and will nearly guarantee
data loss. There are many of
Hi!
I send PR, usb/128115
Thx,
Borodin Oleg
Kaliningrad, Russia
Hans Petter Selasky ?:
Hi Borodin,
Please make a PR, attach your patch and assign it to USB so that it does not
get lost.
--HPS
On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Borodin Oleg wrote:
Patch for correct determine work
FreeBSD 7.0-Release
Intel D975XBX2 motherboard (Intel Matrix Storage Technology)
3 WD Raptor 74 GB in a RAID 5 array
1 WD Raptor 150 GB as a standalone disk
/ and /var mounted on the standalone,, /usr on the RAID 5
I believe what happened was that one of the disks didn't respond for such a
Dear list,
Something happened that I don't think should be possible. I lost all three
disks in my RAID 5 array simultaneously after approx. two years without any
problem. And I fear I will never see my data again. But I really hope some
of you clever persons can give me some hints. My system is:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Jon Theil Nielsen wrote:
Dear list,
Something happened that I don't think should be possible. I lost all three
disks in my RAID 5 array simultaneously after approx. two years without any
problem. And I fear I will never see my data again. But I
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:14:42AM +0100, Dieter wrote:
FreeBSD 7.0-Release
Intel D975XBX2 motherboard (Intel Matrix Storage Technology)
3 WD Raptor 74 GB in a RAID 5 array
1 WD Raptor 150 GB as a standalone disk
/ and /var mounted on the standalone,, /usr on the RAID 5
I believe what
My personal approach to avoiding data loss is (a) avoid buggy things like
inthell and linux.
Interesting, being as we have another thread going as of late that seems
to link transparent data loss with AMD AM2-based systems with certain
models of Adaptec and possibly LSI Logic controller
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:28:43PM +0100, Dieter wrote:
My personal approach to avoiding data loss is (a) avoid buggy things like
inthell and linux.
Interesting, being as we have another thread going as of late that seems
to link transparent data loss with AMD AM2-based systems with
I like Intel as much as I like AMD
That is your right. Inthell has a long history of buggy products,
attempting to hide/ignore bugs, poor customer support, outright
theft, etc. AMD isn't perfect, but the list of bad things is far
far shorter. And there are other companies to
10 matches
Mail list logo
