On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> My server has 8 "hot-plug" slots, that can accept both SATA and SAS drives.
> SATA ones tend to be cheaper for the same features (like cache-sizes), what
> am I getting for the extra money spent on SAS?
>
> Asking specifically about the protoco
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Ben RUBSON wrote:
>> On 09 Aug 2017, at 17:59, Alan Somers wrote:
>>
>> 3) SAS drives have a lot of fancy features that you may not need or
>> care about. For example, (...) their error
>> reporting capabilities are more sophi
