multiple incoming lines

2005-09-20 Thread G Bryant
Hi all, I hope someone can help me with a routing / Natd / ipfw problem i'm having. Setup description: 1x FreeBSD 5.4 3x NIC's: 1x LAN, 2x connected to external DSL modems int_if - LAN ext_if1 - ISP1 ext_if2 - ISP2 Both dsl modems use NAT too, so it is a nat - nat, but did have it working for

Re: dummynet patch

2005-09-20 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, Yes, thanks! But is a little redundant and confused to pass packets to multiple pipe and queue. Isn't more elegant to put an option on queue that limit maximum bandwitdth to that queue (like bw option for pipe)? I dont know programming (not well), but i think that, can do the job, if is

Re: multiple incoming lines

2005-09-20 Thread vladone
U have (for set 2) this rules to divert packets that outgoing: $cmd 10050 set 2 divert natd2 ip from any to any out via $ext_if1 $cmd 10050 set 2 divert natd2 ip from any to any out via $ext_if2 I dont understand what u want to do? This rules translate all adress that outgoing throught $ext_if1

Re: multiple incoming lines

2005-09-20 Thread Oliver Fromme
G Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Setup description: 1x FreeBSD 5.4 3x NIC's: 1x LAN, 2x connected to external DSL modems int_if - LAN ext_if1 - ISP1 ext_if2 - ISP2 Both dsl modems use NAT too, so it is a nat - nat, but did have it working for a single external line. I am

Re[2]: dummynet patch

2005-09-20 Thread vladone
I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a queue, with queue settings. And exist a precedent, queue paramater that exist for pipe and queue. For example, if a bw parameter is not used for queue, then

Re: dummynet patch

2005-09-20 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:20:26PM +0300, vladone wrote: I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a queue, with queue settings. it not implemented because there is an equivalently efficient mechanism

Re: IPFW2+NAT stateful rules VS. FTP

2005-09-20 Thread Peter Rosa
Hi all, I am not sure, if my post came here before, so I try again. Please, sorry if I re-post the same, but I still can not make it work. - Original message- Thanks for the reply but... If you use passive mode FTP, that ought to work

Re: dummynet patch

2005-09-20 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a queue, with queue settings. And exist a precedent, queue paramater that exist for pipe and queue. For example, if a bw parameter is not used for queue,