https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
--- Comment #2 from Helge Oldach ---
(In reply to Mark Felder from comment #1)
Tested and works.
However the reass should come *before* the check-state as fragments (except the
first) don't include protocol and port numbers and thus cannot
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:45:22 -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 08:43, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9920
> >
> > I've always used these rules from 'client' and 'simple' rulesets:
> >${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag
> > which I long ago f
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
However, looking at the review patch, I do wonder if the reass shouldn't
> precede, rather than follow, the check-state?
>
>
Absolutely, yes - fragments don't carry sub-protocol info.
--
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 08:43, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:49:25 +, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
> >
> > Mark Felder changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> >
> ---
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:49:25 +, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
>
> Mark Felder changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> --
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
Mark Felder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216867
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-am...@freebsd.org |
Assignee|freebsd-b...@fr