On 29.10.2018 20:46, Dries Michiels wrote:
>>> Isn't there a way to let IPFW determine what interface to use (and
>>> thus IPv6
>>> prefix) for external translation? (for IPv4 NAT there is no need to
>>> specify the external IPv4 address)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I can add this feature to
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrey V. Elsukov
> Sent: maandag 29 oktober 2018 18:35
> To: Dries Michiels ; freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org;
> freebsd-...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Configuring IPv6 on jails
>
> On 29.10.2018 17:56, Dries Michiels wrote:
>
On 29.10.2018 17:56, Dries Michiels wrote:
> * Use IPFW IPv6 prefix translation for the jail /64 prefix; translate
> between global routable /64 prefix and fd00::1/64 (as example). The latter
> can be statically configured in jail.conf.
>
> My problem here is that the IPFW rule needs the
Hello,
I'm converting everything in my network to dual stack. So far so good. I
came to a stop when I started to think about my jails.
Right now my jails have a private IPv4 address and get NAT-ed by IPFW to
reach to IPv4 internet.
My ISP gives me a /56 IPv6 prefix which I obtain by using
