Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-16 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Ian Smith wrote: On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote in 20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au: sm On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: sm On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: sm

Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-15 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote in 20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au: sm On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: sm On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: sm On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: sm [..] sm We could: sm

Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-15 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote in 20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au: sm On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: sm On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: sm On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith

Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-07 Thread Ian Smith
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: Folks, [ If someone implements an /etc/rc.d/ipfw reload command that reliably works over a remote session without any open firewall window, great, but I'd rather not