Hello Luigi,
Seems, Alex answered most of you questions
LR On the negative side:
LR - documentation on new features is completely absent. Just a brief mention
LR in the manpage of ftag/funtag, a short comment in a C source code.
# Fast ipfw tagging (ftag) - you can assign up to 32 ftags on
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:24:09PM +0200, Alter wrote:
Hello Luigi,
Seems, Alex answered most of you questions
LR On the negative side:
LR - documentation on new features is completely absent. Just a brief mention
LR in the manpage of ftag/funtag, a short comment in a C source code.
Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several
extensions
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw-melifaro
Responsible-Changed-By: melifaro
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 1 15:54:17 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:54:35PM +, melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several
extensions
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw-melifaro
Responsible-Changed-By: melifaro
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 1 15:54:17 UTC
On 01.07.2012 23:09, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:54:35PM +, melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement and several
extensions
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw-melifaro
Responsible-Changed-By: melifaro
Responsible
The following reply was made to PR kern/156770; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, al...@alter.org.ua
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/156770: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement
and several extensions
Date: Fri, 15
The following reply was made to PR kern/156770; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alter al...@alter.org.ua
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Alter al...@alter.org.ua
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/156770: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement
and several extensions
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:11
] [dummynet] [patch]: performance improvement
and several extensions
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:58:56 +0200
Hi, Team.
Do you plan to port this patch to FreeBSD-10 or 9?
It will be veri nice
especially this feature:
# it is possible to use bmap instead of port list. It gives
Old Synopsis: [patch] dummynet and vnet use results in panic
New Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch] dummynet and vnet use results in panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Feb 7 05:33:05 UTC 2010
Responsible
Thanks for reply Luigi!
I want to implements, but i dont know programming so good to modify
dummynet code.
My sugestions is because i love dummynet, i think that work great, but
need some improvements, to be more adaptable to different situations.
For moment will utilize, passing packets to
Hi,
Yes, thanks! But is a little redundant and confused to pass packets to
multiple pipe and queue. Isn't more elegant to put an option on queue
that limit maximum bandwitdth to that queue (like bw option for pipe)?
I dont know programming (not well), but i think that, can do the job,
if is
I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich
dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a
queue, with queue settings.
And exist a precedent, queue paramater that exist for pipe and
queue.
For example, if a bw parameter is not used for queue, then
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:20:26PM +0300, vladone wrote:
I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich
dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a
queue, with queue settings.
it not implemented because there is an equivalently efficient
mechanism
Hi,
I know what is WF2Q, but still dont see what is the problem for wich
dont't exist a possibility to limit bandwidth that is given to a
queue, with queue settings.
And exist a precedent, queue paramater that exist for pipe and
queue.
For example, if a bw parameter is not used for queue,
Can someone make an patch for dummynet, so an user can't get maximum
bandwith. Queue work great for sharing same bandwidth, but an user can
get much banditdth if is not used but anothers.
So is wonderfull if i can put an paramaters for queue (like for pipe),
to limit bandwidth:
For example:
ipfw
15 matches
Mail list logo
