Hi Marcelo Araujo!
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:53:26 -0300; Marcelo Araujo wrote about 'Re: [HEADS UP!]
IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate':
2.5. Just to mention: modip, counter limits, fragments.
These patches are already currently discussed in ipfw@, but included
here just to not forget.
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Looked at the patch. Some line are changed e.g. in NAT definitions without any
visible changes, strange.
Also, you're adding 7 opcode in the kernel, 2 for match and 5 for setting,
while having single modip action in userland. In the case of significantly
changing
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi Julian Elischer!
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:53:44 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: [HEADS
UP!] IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate':
here are some of my ideas for ipfw changes:
1/ redo locking so that packets do not have to get locks on the
structure... I
Synopsis: ipfw nat traceroute problem
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw-piso
Responsible-Changed-By: piso
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 20:32:04 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mine.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122109
Hi Marcelo Araujo!
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:17:48 -0300; Marcelo Araujo wrote about 'Re: [HEADS UP!]
IPFW Ideas: possible SoC 2008 candidate':
Of course, I've interest in any external support, because I need to
finish my degree project and I'm a bit busy. Any help are welcome and
please feel
