Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to the
IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there (other
than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the neccessary to
add it myself ;) )?
--
Matt Dawson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 16:33:04 Matt Dawson wrote:
Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to
the IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there
(other than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the
neccessary to add it
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) - ( nat_router ) - ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
I have a problem at the scheme:
( gw ) - ( nat_router ) - ( https )
real.ip0real.ip1 10.19.90.110.19.90.2
If I use ipfw+natd on nat_router then redirect to https server and to
nat_router local address 10.19.90.1 is well, but if ipfw+nat - redirect to
Matt Dawson wrote:
Just a quick question: What would it take to have similar functionality to the
IPv4 tables in ipfw for v6? Is there a specific reason it isn't there (other
than the fact that I haven't got my finger out and learnt the neccessary to
add it myself ;) )?
there is no reason
