So while thinking about states etc, it occured to me, what does THIS
do on subsequent packets in the session?
10 skipto tablearg tcp from table(3) to me keep-state
On 4/08/2016 11:42 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/08/2016 3:08 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev
On 4/08/2016 3:08 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
important for me. (store-state)?
2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it
On 4/08/2016 12:44 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
On 02.08.2016 09:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
I don't have rights to commit my changes, and looks like I can not
persuade others that my changes are Ok as-is, with all changes, made on
requests from reviewers.
Personally, I think, that (1) + (2)
Wow, this is getting to be a very useful tool.
thanks for all the work. I look forward to the port..
On 4/08/2016 5:53 AM, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
Am 03.08.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Julian Elischer :
On 2/08/2016 8:50 PM, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
Am 02.08.2016 um 05:08 schrieb
> Am 03.08.2016 um 11:13 schrieb Julian Elischer :
>
> On 2/08/2016 8:50 PM, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
>>> Am 02.08.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Julian Elischer :
>>>
>>> looking for thoughts from people who know the new IPFW features well..
>>>
>>>
>>> A recent
On 03.08.2016 22:08, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
important for me. (store-state)?
2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it < less important
for me.
>>> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to
On 03.08.16 22:07, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
>>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
>>> important for me. (store-state)?
>>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it < less important
>>> for me.
>>
On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most
>> important for me. (store-state)?
>> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it < less important
>> for me.
> So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit
On 02.08.2016 09:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
I don't have rights to commit my changes, and looks like I can not
persuade others that my changes are Ok as-is, with all changes, made on
requests from reviewers.
Personally, I think, that (1) + (2) is orthogonal to (3) and it should
be different
On 2/08/2016 8:50 PM, Dr. Rolf Jansen wrote:
Am 02.08.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Julian Elischer :
looking for thoughts from people who know the new IPFW features well..
A recent addition to our armory is the geoip program that, given an address can
tell you what country it is
10 matches
Mail list logo