Re: Notice on upcoming ipdbtools 1.1.1

> Am 14.08.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Dr. Rolf Jansen : > > As was noticed by the port maintainer, the initial release of ipdbtools 1.1.0 > into the ports did not compile on i386 systems because the lack of the > __uint128_t data type on 32bit systems, and which was used for IPv6

Re: Named states in ipfw (and old rulesets)

On 15.08.2016 9:11, Ian Smith wrote: > One thing I wondered about earlier but didn't ask is that the order of > options is generally not relevant, so for example the commonly used: > > ipfw add skipto $somewhere tcp from $a to $b setup keep-state > > would currently be equally valid as: > >

Re: Named states in ipfw (and old rulesets)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 02:20:19 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Please, change this to some prefix to state name (:name, @name or > > something > > like this) or to "state-action(name)" format. It will be much better: less > > error-prone and will work without ugly warnings on old rulesets.