[Bug 192888] ipfw NAT vulnerable to simple DOS attacks

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192888 --- Comment #8 from Lutz Donnerhacke --- May you please test your problem against 14-CURRENT? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 192888] ipfw NAT vulnerable to simple DOS attacks

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192888 --- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=d261e57deacb0d00d9e827447f235df83dda3e3a commit d261e57deacb0d00d9e827447f235df83dda3e3a Author:

[Bug 255775] panic with ipfw turned on at boot time

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255775 --- Comment #20 from Michael Meiszl --- About the load sequence: I was also suprised to see when I have checked it with "rcorder ..." But it does not seem to be important. I've tried to change the order to insure that gif0 is created and

[Bug 255775] panic with ipfw turned on at boot time

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255775 --- Comment #19 from Michael Meiszl --- Created attachment 225933 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=225933=edit ruleset mam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 255775] panic with ipfw turned on at boot time

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255775 --- Comment #18 from Michael Meiszl --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #17) No big problem, the rules are straightforward. See attached rulesfile. (I needed to blur out some IPs, they are not good for the public) Originally I had

[Bug 255775] panic with ipfw turned on at boot time

2021-06-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255775 --- Comment #17 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Michael Meiszl from comment #16) I don't have a good place to upload vmcores, sorry. Google drive is used sometimes. Reading through again, I'm not sure that a vmcore will be very