I'm having a bit of trouble backporting 7.x to 6.x, 6.2 Release
specifically. Before I continue down this road, in the name of not
re-inventing the wheel twice, does anyone already have a current patch
which will work on 6.2 ? Thank You!
AFAIK no.
--
bye,
P.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:41:50PM -0500, Chris Bowman (Home) wrote:
I was recently testing the in kernel nat patch, which is an
absolutely wonderful addition in my opinion. I have however run
into one issue, when for example I do the following :
ipfw nat 10 config ip 2.2.2.2
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:41:50PM -0500, Chris Bowman (Home) wrote:
I was recently testing the in kernel nat patch, which is an absolutely
wonderful addition in my opinion. I have however run into one issue, when
for example I do the following :
ipfw nat 10 config ip 2.2.2.2
[snip]
It was indeed the tarball downloaded from
http://ubi8.imc.pi.cnr.it/~flag/libalias/libalias.tgz ... Thank you,
I'll give the 7.x code a try.
Paolo Pisati wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:41:50PM -0500, Chris Bowman (Home) wrote:
I was recently testing the in kernel nat patch, which is
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:42:36AM +1000, Vini Engel wrote:
Paolo Pisati said the following on 15/05/06 08:05:
Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
fixed the checksum
Paolo Pisati said the following on 15/05/06 08:05:
Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
fixed the checksum corruption occurring to redirected/generated traffic
to/by a local
Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
fixed the checksum corruption occurring to redirected/generated traffic
to/by a local interface on the nat box.
For more info:
Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Probably you dont have the latest RELENG_6 code or it is not in sync
(say, manually modified). I have ipfw nat running on -RC1 and -RC2,
i386 and amd64 and with clean src the patch applies perfectly.
Yes, I try again. And I get error again!
cd /usr/obj
rm ALL
cd
Now, I think that we have to make some ipfw example code for NAT
in-kernel with and without keep-state/chack-state .
I start in monday with stateful ipfw.
Thanks for help me!!!
(Now I have FreeBSD 6.1)
I haven't tried with keep-state yes (dont even know if keep-state is
ready to maintain
Paolo Pisati wrote:
I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
To apply it:
cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
cd /usr/src
patch -p3 libalias_ipfw.patch
then you have to
Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:
Paolo Pisati wrote:
I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a patchset
for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
To apply it:
cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
cd /usr/src
patch -p3 libalias_ipfw.patch
Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:
Paolo Pisati wrote:
I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a patchset
for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
To apply it:
cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
cd /usr/src
patch -p3 libalias_ipfw.patch
Paolo Pisati wrote:
Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:
Paolo Pisati wrote:
I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
To apply it:
cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
cd /usr/src
patch
I just released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a
patchset for 6.x, get it here:
http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz
To apply it:
cp libalias_ipfw.patch /usr/src
cd /usr/src
patch -p3 libalias_ipfw.patch
then you have to recompile install:
kernel,
14 matches
Mail list logo
