the outside
>> world where my hoster looks unkindly on mac-addresses not belonging to
>> the nic of my server. So I have vnet jails behind a common ifbridge.
>> All jails have their default routes point to the bridge-interface of
>> the host. The host works as a rou
of my server. So I have vnet jails behind a common ifbridge.
All jails have their default routes point to the bridge-interface of
the host. The host works as a router.
Tags stopped working across vnet and bridge
---
On a long running host that is still
where my hoster looks unkindly on mac-addresses not
belonging to
the nic of my server. So I have vnet jails behind a common
ifbridge.
All jails have their default routes point to the bridge-interface
of
the host. The host works as a router.
Tags stopped working across vnet and bridge
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178482
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org
--
You are
a problem with ipfw/dummynet, pipes and VNET jails using FreeBSD 12.0
! release. Packets are lost in the pipe when any impairments are configured.
!
! I set up several VNET jails and connected them via epairs, in order to
! do tests with different network and routing configurations. On some jails
Hi All,
When a vnet is deleted, I see that the function vnet_ipfw_uninit is
invoked which invokes uma_zdestroy to destroy the zone.
When dynamic firewall rules are added, the function add_dyn_rule allocates
memory from the ip fw zone using the function uma_zalloc.
However the expired
The following reply was made to PR kern/178482; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, fb...@a1poweruser.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/178482: [ipfw] logging problem from vnet jail
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 23:44:40 +1000
9.1-RELEASE kernel
Old Synopsis: ipfw logging problem from vnet jail
New Synopsis: [ipfw] logging problem from vnet jail
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 20 03:26:47 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s
On 19.06.2012 12:56, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
I want to ask aout VNET jails, i read somehwre that I'm able to run IPFW,
but not PF firewall in a cnet jail.
is that correct?
i want a vnet jail basicly for nat, so natd with ipfw + ipdivert is my
1) You can do nat without vnet.
2) ipfw nat
Thank you.
I want to use vnet jail for a specific subnet that I need to seperate from
the system.
so basicly i create a vlan + a bridged interface to the public.
these two (vlan+bridged interface- epair0a) will in in the vnet jail, so I
can do NAT only for that vlan going out.
This is the idea
Hi
When using dummynet inside a vnet node with a simple pipe the kernel
panic on the first packet.
I use 8.0-STABLE cvsuped at 7 Apr 15:28
The ipfw code with dummynet is largely changed and the patch in the url
below will not work.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143621
On 4/7/10 1:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:58:38PM +0200, Anders Hagman wrote:
Hi
When using dummynet inside a vnet node with a simple pipe the kernel
panic on the first packet.
I use 8.0-STABLE cvsuped at 7 Apr 15:28
The ipfw code with dummynet is largely changed
Old Synopsis: [patch] dummynet and vnet use results in panic
New Synopsis: [ipfw] [dummynet] [patch] dummynet and vnet use results in panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Feb 7 05:33:05 UTC 2010
Responsible
13 matches
Mail list logo
