irnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:44:01 -0400
Erf. I've since patched in the actual diffs for PR 91245 into a
clean in
t;,
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:33:34 -0400
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Stephen E. Halpin wrote:
>> processing, and it
PROTECTED]>,
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:15:30 +0400
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:26:36PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
A> Stephen E. Halp
PROTECTED]>,
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:26:36 +0400
Stephen E. Halpin wrote:
> processing, and it worked fine. I still have a que
t;,
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't
interpreted correctly
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:01:39 -0400
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. The changes look good.
I've tested the changes for ip_fw2.c
