Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-19 Thread Julian Elischer
On 4/16/14, 11:40 PM, bycn82 wrote: Hi According to the `loop` in the chk() function, everytime it was invoked, the arg will be checked against `the chain`, so I assumed that the same is always the same, I saw that, `the chain` is always `V_layer3_chain`, but I did not find any V_layer2_chain

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread bycn82
/188543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:33:34 +0800 --001a11c14da43b033404f71fbe29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have tested

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread lhmwzy
The following reply was made to PR kern/188543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, byc...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:12:42 +0800

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread ae
Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw-ae Responsible-Changed-By: ae Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 16 14:19:42 UTC 2014 Responsible-Changed-Why: Take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188543

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread bycn82
21:20:00 +0800, lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com wrote: The following reply was made to PR kern/188543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: lhmwzy lhm...@gmail.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, byc...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 Date: Wed

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread bycn82
Cool! I just finished the overview of the source code,and finally understood the `for loop` in the ip_fw2.c roughly, beside of the coding style,sorry for my ironic words, I want to ask whether my understanding is correct. you wrap the packet/frame in the `check frame` or `check packet`

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-16 Thread bycn82
Hi According to the `loop` in the chk() function, everytime it was invoked, the arg will be checked against `the chain`, so I assumed that the same is always the same, I saw that, `the chain` is always `V_layer3_chain`, but I did not find any V_layer2_chain !!! So I assumed that currently

Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10

2014-04-15 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-ipfw Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 16 01:40:14 UTC 2014 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over