On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:02:11 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote
in 20141003025830.d48...@sola.nimnet.asn.au:
sm which rules will be flushed when /etc/rc.d/ipfw runs, but should enable
sm DHCP to work? I'm not sure whether those rules are exactly correct or
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote
in 20141013202423.j56...@sola.nimnet.asn.au:
sm Anyway, looking at rcorder /etc/rc.d/* there are quite a few possible
sm interdependencies to explore before considering moving ipfw, including
sm its relationship to pf - some people do use both - and perhaps
Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote
in 20141003025830.d48...@sola.nimnet.asn.au:
sm which rules will be flushed when /etc/rc.d/ipfw runs, but should enable
sm DHCP to work? I'm not sure whether those rules are exactly correct or
sm sufficient for DHCP, but principle is to anly allow what's
Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote
in 542155fb.9020...@freebsd.org:
ju On 9/23/14, 2:01 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
ju On 21.09.2014 09:58, Hiroki Sato wrote:
ju Hi,
ju
juI would like your comments about the attached patch to /etc/rc.
ju
juThe problem I want to fix by this
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 16:39:13 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote
in 542155fb.9020...@freebsd.org:
ju On 9/23/14, 2:01 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
ju On 21.09.2014 09:58, Hiroki Sato wrote:
ju Hi,
ju
juI would like your comments about the
On 9/23/14, 2:01 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 21.09.2014 09:58, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi,
I would like your comments about the attached patch to /etc/rc.
The problem I want to fix by this patch is as follows.
net.inet{,6}.fw.enable are set to 1 by default at boot time if IPFW
kernel
On 21.09.2014 09:58, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi,
I would like your comments about the attached patch to /etc/rc.
The problem I want to fix by this patch is as follows.
net.inet{,6}.fw.enable are set to 1 by default at boot time if IPFW
kernel module is loaded or statically compiled into a
Hi,
I would like your comments about the attached patch to /etc/rc.
The problem I want to fix by this patch is as follows.
net.inet{,6}.fw.enable are set to 1 by default at boot time if IPFW
kernel module is loaded or statically compiled into a kernel. And by
default IPFW has only a deny
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:58:12 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi,
I would like your comments about the attached patch to /etc/rc.
The problem I want to fix by this patch is as follows.
net.inet{,6}.fw.enable are set to 1 by default at boot time if IPFW
kernel module is loaded or
