On Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 09:16, Ian Smith wrote:
Excuse top-post, but the gmail header on this message was (surprisingly)
insufficiently anonymised to disguise its origin:
That could very well be Joe Barbish. It could also be someone in the
same city who uses FreeBSD and likes qjails.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Sean Chittenden se...@groupon.com wrote:
Well this is a rather trendy topic of late and timely. I'm very happy to
see a renaissance and renewed interest in container administration for
FreeBSD.
[...]
For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated,
On 2015-01-26 22:46, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:23:48 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
[Sean Chittenden wrote:]
For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is
depreciated.
Hmm, there's no notation at
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is
depreciated.
[...]
Really the word most people use is deprecated rather than depreciated.
The OP seemed well versed in the topic so I'm pretty sure
For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is depreciated.
Hmm, there's no notation at
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutilsportname=ezjail ,
nor in the Makefile AFAICT.
For a book, excluding ezjail would exclude a huge portion of the user base
and
