Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Hi,
Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.
This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
single-IPv4 jails
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living
with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be
on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone
had
Andrew Hotlab wrote:
I think ezjail urgently needs some updates in order not to remain behind the
new
features in FreeBSD which can dramatically improve the jail system usage
(vnet,
ZFS, multiple FIB support, etc). I'm not a shell script expert, but my
everyday
work gives me the chance
Christer Solskogen wrote:
I'm preparing a talk for BLUG (the local Linux/BSD group) and I want to know
how
YOU manage your jails, there sure are more than one way do it.
ezjail - http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/ezjail/
jailaudit - http://anonsvn.h3q.com/projects/jailaudit/
greetings,
jhell wrote:
Just for some more idea's to build upon.
You could have a thousand jails at no extra space besides one base jail
installed at 160M and using zfs snapshot and clone. with no additional
mounting needed besides the actual jail and its device directory. ;)
The only data that is
Merijn Verstraaten wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:54:22 +0100, Philipp Wuensche
cryx-free...@h3q.com wrote:
The only data that is collected after that is user data which is a good
thing with no extra cost of system mount points and disk usage.
Thats only true until the first update
