Re: anyone using ssl accellorator cards in jail?

2009-04-06 Thread Michael Scheidell



Brian A. Seklecki wrote:

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 07:38 -0700, Michael Scheidell wrote:
  

trying to speed things up.



I suspect that syscalls that support acceleration will simply fall right
through the jail into the host kernel.

I'll be testing that some time next week -- so I'll let you know.  I
don't think file handle access to /dev/crypto is required for Engine
support.   


Again, I'll let you know ~BAS

  

thanks Brian.  wonder if you need one card per virtual ip?


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
 *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

   * Certified SNORT Integrator
   * 2009 Hot Company Award Finalist, World Executive Alliance
   * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
   * Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
   * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008


_
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/

_
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: anyone using ssl accellorator cards in jail?

2009-04-06 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 07:38 -0700, Michael Scheidell wrote:
 trying to speed things up.

I suspect that syscalls that support acceleration will simply fall right
through the jail into the host kernel.

I'll be testing that some time next week -- so I'll let you know.  I
don't think file handle access to /dev/crypto is required for Engine
support.   

Again, I'll let you know ~BAS



___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org