Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-03-05 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:24:47 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to > > I just realized yesterday that it also stops in parallel (in the > background).

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Remko Lodder (from Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:44:10 +0100): Note that I haven't tsted it, but I don't see any errors in the patch. ---snip--- -- Simon L. Nielsen Snipping a whole lot of data... Thanks Simon, I will try to get to that as soon as possible, Alexander: please feel

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-24 Thread Remko Lodder
> Note that I haven't tsted it, but I don't see any errors in the patch. > >> ---snip--- > -- > Simon L. Nielsen > Snipping a whole lot of data... Thanks Simon, I will try to get to that as soon as possible, Alexander: please feel free to do it earlier if possible, my internet access is "limit

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-24 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
B0;251;0cOn 2010.01.14 13:35:16 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Remko Lodder (from Tue, 5 Jan 2010 > 11:35:48 +0100): > > > On Tue, January 5, 2010 11:24 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-14 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> (from Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:45:34 +0100): Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to I just realized yest

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> (from Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:45:34 +0100): Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to I just realized yesterday that it also stops

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-14 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Remko Lodder (from Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:35:48 +0100): On Tue, January 5, 2010 11:24 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to I just realized yesterday that it

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 1/5/10 5:35 AM, Remko Lodder wrote: My first reaction is to only allow to start in the background, but everything else needs to be serialized. i second that 'start in parallel', stop in serial, however, even with stop in serial, if I have 64 jails, even in a fast, quad/quad co

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-05 Thread Remko Lodder
On Tue, January 5, 2010 11:24 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to > > I just realized yesterday that it also stops in parallel (in the > background). This is

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-05 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to I just realized yesterday that it also stops in parallel (in the background). This is bad. It may be the case that a jail is not full

Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies

2010-01-05 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to I just realized yesterday that it also stops in parallel (in the background). This is bad. It may be the case that a jail is not fully stopped via the rc scrip

starting jails in the background & dependencies

2009-12-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to prevent that a broken jail causes a good jail not to start), I have to problem how to express dependencies. Scenario: - several jails on the same machine (via ezjail) - one jail depends on the services of another jail, e.