In response to Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at
subject. Thanks!
You can NFS mount on the host, and it will be visible within the jail.
Don't know if that helps your situation or not.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Oh: I haven't checked if this actually works. I don't know if all places
DTRT then. Normally it should work, but you better test if it really puts
the FS in the place where you want it, that you can mount/umount it, that
mount -v shows the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at subject.
Thanks!
Correct. If you are not afraid to patch the system: zfs has the JAIL flag
set, you just need to do the same with nfs.
To do this edit
Quoting Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 25 Jun 2008
16:57:17 +0100 (BST)):
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Oh: I haven't checked if this actually works. I don't know if all
places DTRT then. Normally it should work, but you better test if
it really puts the FS
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Safe in the sense that they might, or might not, immediately panic. Not
safe in the sense that the resulting system would necessarily have the
expected or desired security properties. It wouldn't surprise me if, just
for example, allowing
In response to Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:21 -0400 Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at
subject. Thanks!
You can NFS mount on the host, and it will be
