Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote: Hi, On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT Yes. is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE There are two ways. The first is: 1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:00 -0500, alexus wrote: > as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :) ~BAS -- Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
"Brian A. Seklecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT > The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :) The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new functionality? If the forme

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new > functionality? The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the latter. -- Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. sig