Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-14 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone had

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-14 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone had complained the months before..

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-14 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone had complained the months before..

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new functionality? The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Philipp Wuensche cryx-free...@h3q.com writes: Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. It is uneasy to parse too. jls | tail +3 | while read line ; do set $line if [ $# = 3 ] ; then

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use single-IPv4 jails as before there should be

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-11 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use single-IPv4 jails

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-11 Thread Andrew Snow
I patched my jls to output the list of jails in XML CSV format. makes things alot nicer to script with. Might be worth doing for everyone. - Andrew ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote: Hi, On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT Yes. is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE There are two ways. The first is: 1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:00 -0500, alexus wrote: as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :) ~BAS -- Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Collaborative Fusion, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-05 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new functionality? The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the latter. -- Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Collaborative Fusion, Inc.

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT Yes. is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE There are two ways. The first is: 1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD src tree via your chosen source tracker

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-02 Thread alexus
as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE which according to freebsd.org will be in june 2009, which we all know how accured their schedule is, so, my guess is very well Q4 of 2009 (if we lucky), I somehow was under impression (and

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-01 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 01.12.2008 um 10:41 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb: as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit HEAD. See commit message attached. Thank you and everyone who worked so hard on this for so long! I shall proceed to put this into production this year, if I find the time

Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

2008-12-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:41:46 + (UTC)): Hi, as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit HEAD. See commit message attached. Will this introduce changes how multicast is handled in jails, or is it the same behavior as