Re: Using FreeBSD server as a router??

2001-08-03 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:57:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been combing the freebsd.org site for the last two days attempting to find some documentation on how to configure and use a FreeBSD server as a router. I have found some information on configuring the server as a

VLANs with MTU 1500 an fxp driver?

2001-08-03 Thread Andreas Gerstenberg
Hi, I'm using VLANs (IEEE 802.1q taggig) with the fxp driver. In the past (up to 4.3 RELEASE and STABLE) the was a patch nessesary to get the MTU up to 1500 Bytes on the vlan-interfaces. I was using the patch found on http://www.euitt.upm.es/~pjlobo/fbsdvlan.html. This patch looks outdated, I

Anyone using SMC 8040TX pccard?

2001-08-03 Thread Jim Pirzyk
So I have an SMC 8040TX pccard in an IBM Thinkpad 701CS. It is currently using the ed driver to talk on the network and this driver works ok (I can get 5+ Mb/sec outbound), but the performance problem is that I only get 1Mb/sec inbound. So I have two questions, 1) is the ed driver the

frequentl lost default route

2001-08-03 Thread Maverick
dear all i have 2 freebsd-20010710-stable box A B, all same hardware compaq-1600 + 3c905c-TX connect to switch, switch connect to router so the seting is easy all defaultroute is the router. it works great. But suddenly box A frequentl lost default route it happen less in 2 minute, and to keep

Request for testers: multicast patch

2001-08-03 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
[Bcc'ed to -net] On http://people.freebsd.org/~dcs/ip_output.c there is a port to stable of the revisions 1.127 through 1.130 of /sys/netinet/ip_output.c. These patches do the following: 1) Enable one to send multicast packets without a default route or routes to the multicast addresses. 2)

kvm_read

2001-08-03 Thread raviprasad20
Hi, I found that some of the commands read the virtual memory of the kernel. Is there a way for me to know which address of the memory is currently being accessed? regards ravi prasad __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping

Re: FreeBSD V4.3 running on ABIT VP6 Dual Proc

2001-08-03 Thread Sjaak Jobses
Stacey Roberts wrote: Hi Guys, I've just ordered FreeBSD V4.3, hoping to install it on a VP6 Dual proc system running two P111 933's. I've tried searching for known issues with this particular motherboard via all the search facilities at the FreeBSD sites, but cannot find any actual

Re: FreeBSD V4.3 running on ABIT VP6 Dual Proc

2001-08-03 Thread Wes Peters
Sjaak Jobses wrote: Stacey Roberts wrote: Hi Guys, I've just ordered FreeBSD V4.3, hoping to install it on a VP6 Dual proc system running two P111 933's. I've tried searching for known issues with this particular motherboard via all the search facilities at the FreeBSD sites,

Re: ng_one2many usage

2001-08-03 Thread Julian Elischer
Jim Pirzyk wrote: So I tried to use the one2many netgraph module, but I get errors right away. Here is what I get: Jim.Pirzyk@snoopy:~ 47sudo ngctl -d mkpeer trnk0: one2many upper one ngctl: sendto(trnk0:): No such file or directory ngctl: send msg: No such file or directory Any

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c

2001-08-03 Thread Bill Fenner
@@ -964,7 +957,7 @@ sendorfree: /* clean ipsec history once it goes out of the node */ ipsec_delaux(m); #endif - if (error == 0) { + if (error == 0 ia) { /* Record statistics for this interface address. */

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c

2001-08-03 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Bill Fenner wrote: @@ -964,7 +957,7 @@ sendorfree: /* clean ipsec history once it goes out of the node */ ipsec_delaux(m); #endif - if (error == 0) { + if (error == 0 ia) { /* Record statistics for this interface address.

Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL

2001-08-03 Thread Assar Westerlund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: we can probably try it out (if it seems really necessary for us) on KAME tree, but not on *BSD-current nor *BSD official releases. I believe one of the intended uses of this would be for telnet/rpcbind, so I think it would really have to go into

Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL

2001-08-03 Thread itojun
we had a local discussion within KAME. we do not really like to support PF_LOCAL, unless there's clear standard behavior for AF_LOCAL case. I think this is the wrong approach. If we're always going to wait for a clear and standarized behaviour of something before implementing