Hi all,
I've been trying to get an IPSec tunneling VPN between two boxes working
without much success. I've read the FAQs and HOWTOs on www.freebsd.org,
www.freebsddiary.org, www.daemonnews.org and www.kame.net and they all have
helped me get closer to where I want to be, but I'm still missing
Howdy!
I am interested in tuning UDP for NFS over a 100Mbs LAN.
Specifically, to tune UDP, what are guidelines/restrictions for
setting the sysclt variables
net.inet.udp.maxdgram
net.inet.udp.recvspace
I assume that increasing both of these
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:09:02 -0400, Steve Shorter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
net.inet.udp.maxdgram
net.inet.udp.recvspace
I assume that increasing both of these will improve performance.
Neither of these have any impact on UDP performance. In fact, there
really are no UDP
* Steve Shorter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010831 12:14] wrote:
Howdy!
I am interested in tuning UDP for NFS over a 100Mbs LAN.
Specifically, to tune UDP, what are guidelines/restrictions for
setting the sysclt variables
net.inet.udp.maxdgram
net.inet.udp.recvspace
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using UDP is usually a bad idea, I would use tcp, I find that these
flags make for a decent mount point that's quite fast:
rw,tcp,intr,nfsv3,-w=32768,-r=32768
FreeBSD's src/etc/amd.map file still has
* John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010831 15:03] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using UDP is usually a bad idea, I would use tcp, I find that these
flags make for a decent mount point that's quite fast:
By the way, RFC2893 has the following text:
(snip)
Thus, people would say that KAME (FreeBSD) is not compliant to RFC
2893.
i guess you did not check the original question.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
Hackers,
Attached some patches that implements device cloning
(with devfs(5) support) for tap(4). The implementation is based
on resource manager (see tun(4) and gif(4)).
Brooks Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) took a quick
look at the patch and seems has no objection. Please review,
