Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/4/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jack Vogel wrote: This is a patch for the stack and the em driver to enable TSO on CURRENT. Previously I had problems getting it to work, but this is functional. I should note that CURRENT is

Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support?

2006-09-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us know if that worked? That may work okay but then would I loose

Re: half-duplex

2006-09-05 Thread Spadge Fromley
em1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU inet 60.1.2.3 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 220.233.99.39 ether 00:04:23:bc:3a:d1 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP half-duplex) status: active It's

Request status on sk(4) for 88E8053 Yukon PCI-E GbE

2006-09-05 Thread Andrew Sinclair
Attempting to diagnose an undetected NIC: $ uname -a FreeBSD FreeSBIE.LiveCD 6.1-RC2 FreeBSD 6.1-RC2 #3: $ pciconf -lv ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x00011179 chip=0x436211ab rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device =

Re: Request status on sk(4) for 88E8053 Yukon PCI-E GbE

2006-09-05 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Andrew Sinclair wrote: $ pciconf -lv ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x00011179 chip=0x436211ab rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)' device = '88E8053 Yukon PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (copper)'

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with patches

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Prafulla Deuskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from the other BSDs we

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from the other BSDs we have to remark this in the

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Prafulla Deuskar
Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from the

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Thomas Herrlin
Jack Vogel wrote: On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). motherboard OBN (On Board NIC) --

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Andre Oppermann
Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Your patch looks good and is the way to go. So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver would you commit to to -current? Absolutely. :-) The driver related changes can

Re: RFC: TSO patch for current

2006-09-05 Thread Jack Vogel
On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jack Vogel wrote: On 9/5/06, Andre Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prafulla Deuskar wrote: Your patch looks good and is the way to go. So after Jack confirms that your patch works with the em driver would you commit to to -current?

Re: tcp/udp performance

2006-09-05 Thread Danny Braniss
Jack Vogel wrote: On 8/30/06, Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ever since 6.1 I've seen fluctuations in the performance of the em (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet). motherboard OBN (On Board NIC)