On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:19:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
According to the following thread, one must do more then just apply the NAT-T
patch and rebuild the kernel:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011855.html
What other steps are necessary to
VANHULLEBUS Yvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Yvan,
rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
programs uses some structs which size are changed by the patch.
Is there any hope to see NATT support, based on your patches, included
in -current before 7.0-RELEASE
Julian Elischer wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
will it barf?
It would barf for things like bridging where the
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 5/29/07, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack,
Jack Vogel wrote:
Stefan,
I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing
something
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote:
VANHULLEBUS Yvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Yvan,
Hi Eric,
rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
programs uses some structs which size are changed by the patch.
Is there any hope to see NATT
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Eric Masson wrote:
VANHULLEBUS Yvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Yvan,
Hi Eric,
rebuilding/reinstalling world may be very interesting as some system
programs uses some structs which size are changed by
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
[...]
Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
You're right: I was sure that this
I wish this would happen too. I'm using NAT-T in combination with a cisco
client I use for work and home. It works great!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Masson
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:38 AM
To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Cc:
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
will it barf?
erm, what is meant by coalesce ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property
Hello,
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
provider's company site. The provider said my circuit and their one are
treated exactly the same way.
Below is the URL for the download:
My circuit*:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
provider's company site.
[...]
*This server is using FreeBSD 6.2 patch 4 with Apache in the
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
[...]
Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
You're right: I was sure that this
On 5/31/07, Stefan Lambrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much for the help Jack :))
Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to
test it before Monday.
Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the
drivers is too big ? :)
Welcome, turns
On 5/31/07, Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0n Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
Does any driver do this now? And if a driver were to coalesce
packets and send something up the stack that violates mss
will it barf?
erm, what is meant by
Thanks for reply.
Nicolas Gieczewski wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is substantially slower than my
provider's company site.
[...]
*This server is
He stated previously that they are not compatible.
On 5/31/07, Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
I wanted to let everyone know that I will soon have a
new 10G driver to add to the tree. It is a PCI Express
MSI/X adapter, I
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
[]
Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html
I just integrated the patch.
To be able to identify future versions of the
On 5/30/07, Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ermal Luçi wrote:
OK, here it is with stats activated :).
One more: all binary netgraph messages are hidden from user-level in
ng_pf.h. They are all covered with #ifdef _KERNEL. Specially?
No special need just forgotten by me.
I fixed
On 5/31/07, Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:51:35PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
I wanted to let everyone know that I will soon have a
new 10G driver to add to the tree. It is a PCI Express
MSI/X adapter, I would like to call this driver 'ix' rather
than
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:21:13 +0800
Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for reply.
Nicolas Gieczewski wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 22:06:39 +0800, Pang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, I have leased a rack in Asianetcom and some bandwidth.
However, the speed for my curcuit is
20 matches
Mail list logo
