Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless
networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the Unix person,
so,
of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ...
... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do
Cristian KLEIN a écrit :
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless
networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the Unix person,
so,
of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ...
... but, I haven't used wireless at all
Hi there,
Let me say this.. I just like all stuff around IPv6. And now I need one
native IPv6 address for my FreeBSD box, which is email gateway. There
was unknown problem related to IPv6 area between my FreeBSD box
[2002:9be6:9d5d:1::1] and mx1.freebsd.org [2001:4f8:fff6::34].
Here is the shot
I am seeing the em driver on 7.0 sending packets with bad UDP (and
apparently sometimes IP) packet length fields. This is from UDP NFS
traffic (90MB/sec over gige). These packets are dropped on reception by
the kernel and counted.
Here is a tcpdump trace showing some bad packets:
When I make the interface down by ifconfig, all the direct routes are
not deleted. And the addresses state are not changed. And I can even
ping those address in this interface.
Is this correct, or a bug? I test it in vmware virtual machine.
This is my first post to this mailing list, and I don't
I originally posted this to the FreeBSD questions mailing list, but did
not receive any responses. If you are reading this for the second time,
please accept my apologies.
My ISP insists on handing all http traffic off to me on a separate IP
address.
Following is my configuration.
External
Jack Vogel wrote:
You should a couple different adapters below, are you saying that
its just one of them, can you try different ones to see if its specific.
They're both showing the problem.
Also, would you be able to test my latest driver to see if it still
happens?
Where is it?
Kris
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 08:46:53AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a
vlan-trunk?
As from rev1.100 of if_bridge back in June it will correctly use the
On 10/12/07, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should a couple different adapters below, are you saying that
its just one of them, can you try different ones to see if its specific.
Also, would you be able to test my latest driver to see if it still
happens?
Cheers,
Jack
LOL, in
Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
mohans 2007-10-12 19:12:21 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/nfsclientnfs.h nfs_socket.c nfs_subs.c nfsmount.h
Log:
NFS MP scaling changes.
- Eliminate the hideous nfs_sndlock that serialized NFS/TCP request senders
thru the
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:59:44PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 08:46:53AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:42:15PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a
vlan-trunk?
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:38:04 +0800
From: Jiusheng Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I make the interface down by ifconfig, all the direct routes are
not deleted. And the addresses state are not changed. And I can even
ping those address in this interface.
Is this
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mohan's previous commit that increases the nfs server socket buffer size
is also very important for NFS performance. Without it I was only
getting 1-2MB/sec throughput over 10Gb ethernet with UDP mounts
You're trying to use nfs/udp at 10G? I wouldn't expect that to
13 matches
Mail list logo
