Re: Proposed #ifdef change to em

2007-11-01 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
Hi, Jack Vogel wrote: Vladimir, Your one phrase more or less patched invalidated the whole data point. We are talking about code thats checked in and bound for 6.3 :) Oops. I've got it. Maybe we talk about different kinds of watchdog. I have meant TX queue watchdogs. Yes, there is a

Re: em watchdogs - OS involvement

2007-11-01 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jack Vogel wrote: Another bit of data, if I define DEVICE_POLLING on the Oct. snap it also will work. Defining DEVICE_POLLING (globally) breaks configuration of fast interrupt handlers in em. I have to #undef it to test fast interrupt handlers in em without losing

Re: UDP catchall

2007-11-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:53:56AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: It's possible using ipfw to mostly implement this, and with an upcoming change, possible to completely implement this. the uid function of ipfw can act as a does there exist a socket to which this packet would go? test. and

FIN_WAIT_2 on FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE

2007-11-01 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi, I'm seeing strange problem with sockets in state FIN_WAIT_2. netstat -n |grep FIN_WAIT_2|wc -l shows 12234 lines, Those sockets never die and just grow more and more, when finally today I saw this in logs: postfix/smtp[6968]: connect to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[66.249.91.27]: Can't

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Did you miss a file ? I nly see a new header file in here. Am keen to try this out though... -pcf. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version that came thru not have both?? Nope, it's only got if_em.h in it - I just took a look at the actual mime stuff in the email and tere is only one attachment in the version I received. -pete. ___

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Jack Vogel
Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version that came thru not have both?? Jack On 11/1/07, Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Did you miss a file ? I nly see a new

Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Jack Vogel
This is a substantial change to the EM driver that I would appreciate some testing and feedback on. You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Whats in this: A change Mike Silbersack came up with, it makes the watchdog period twice