Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

2008-03-03 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'm looking for a stream exploder.:) 1 2Mbit stream in, and as many as possible out. And 7*1Gb = 14Gbit, so I'd like to be pushing 7000 streams. (One advantage is that they will be UDP streams, so there is a little less bookkeeping in the protocol stack ) Wouldn't

Re: ipfw initialization: SI_ORDER_ANY - SI_ORDER_MIDDLE?

2008-03-03 Thread Paolo Pisati
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:58:50PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: The SI_ORDER_* definitions in /sys/sys/kernel.h are enumerated on a large range, so if the existing code does not have races, you can safely move the non-leaf modules (such as ipfw,ko in your case) to (SI_ORDER_ANY -

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2008-03-03 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work s kern/39937 netipstealth

Re: ipfw initialization: SI_ORDER_ANY - SI_ORDER_MIDDLE?

2008-03-03 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:17:19AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:58:50PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: The SI_ORDER_* definitions in /sys/sys/kernel.h are enumerated on a large range, so if the existing code does not have races, you can safely move the non-leaf

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

2008-03-03 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Łukasz Bromirski wrote: Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'm looking for a stream exploder.:) 1 2Mbit stream in, and as many as possible out. And 7*1Gb = 14Gbit, so I'd like to be pushing 7000 streams. (One advantage is that they will be UDP streams, so there is a little less bookkeeping in the

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

2008-03-03 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Łukasz Bromirski wrote: Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'm looking for a stream exploder.:) 1 2Mbit stream in, and as many as possible out. And 7*1Gb = 14Gbit, so I'd like to be pushing 7000 streams. (One advantage is that they will be UDP streams, so there is a little

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

2008-03-03 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Łukasz Bromirski wrote: My experience is that Multicast in nice in theory and experiment, but when push comes to shove it does not completely deliver. I don't know exact requirements and application used, but given IP TV deployments relying heavily on multicast, and all other VoD technologies

Re: kern/92090: [bge] bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting

2008-03-03 Thread gavin
Synopsis: [bge] bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting State-Changed-From-To: feedback-open State-Changed-By: gavin State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 3 13:32:16 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: Feedback was received - this is still an issue Responsible-Changed-From-To: gavin-freebsd-net

Re: Ephemeral ports patch (fixed)

2008-03-03 Thread Fernando Gont
At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024 to 1. Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I can't

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

2008-03-03 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:54 +0100, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: I don't know exact requirements and application used, but given IP TV deployments relying heavily on multicast, and all other VoD technologies also using multicast...I find Your comments disturbing :) However, if you don't control

drlb: a direct routing loadbalancer

2008-03-03 Thread Jean-Yves Moulin
Hi everybody, I'have made a simple software load-balancer for FreeBSD. It work only in direct-routing mode. This is a kernel module that works for freebsd 6.2, 6.3 and 7.0 (tested) (and netbsd soon). It use pfil in order to watch incoming packet and redirect to real-server. You can define

Re: Ephemeral port range (patch)

2008-03-03 Thread Fernando Gont
At 04:43 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: Earlier in the week, I had commented (via private e-mail?) that I thought that Amit Klein's algorithm which I recently implemented in ip_id.c might be adapted to serve as an ephemeral port allocator. Now that I've thought more about it, I'm

Re: 7.0-RC1 onboard em1 intel pro1000 vanishing occasionally

2008-03-03 Thread Oznon
Hi all, I am currently experiencing the same issue as well except this time around with a Supermicro X7DBU motherboard (Intel® 5000P (Blackford) Chipset). The identical occurence is happening to me as well so we were wondering if anyone had a resolution? Possibly an updated driver for the Intel

Re: 7.0-RC1 onboard em1 intel pro1000 vanishing occasionally

2008-03-03 Thread Oznon
I am experiencing the exact same issue as well except this time around I do not have an IPMI card and I am using the X7DBU motherboard by Supermicro. Any luck? Thanks, Guy Vladimir Ivanov wrote: Andrew Snow wrote: Vladimir Ivanov wrote: We've same issue w/Supermicro boards if IPMI

Re: LOR icmp6_input/nd6_lookup

2008-03-03 Thread gnn
At Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:44:27 -0600, Kevin Day wrote: This is from 7.0-RELEASE: lock order reversal: 1st 0xc3bde2b8 rtentry (rtentry) @ netinet6/nd6.c:1930 2nd 0xc3af367c radix node head (radix node head) @ net/route.c:147 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper

Re: 7.0-RC1 onboard em1 intel pro1000 vanishing occasionally

2008-03-03 Thread Jack Vogel
The fix to this problem is in the new shared code that got checked into CURRENT on Friday. I will be MFCing the changes eventually but if you want to test now you'll need to go with CURRENT. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Oznon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am experiencing the exact same issue

Re: 7.0-RC1 onboard em1 intel pro1000 vanishing occasionally

2008-03-03 Thread Oznon
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly Jack. Your response is very much appreciated for it appears we will be testing with CURRENT for the time being. Cheers, Guy Jack Vogel wrote: The fix to this problem is in the new shared code that got checked into CURRENT on Friday. I will be

Re: Ephemeral port range (patch)

2008-03-03 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote: (Shame on me... somehow you mail got stuck in my queue, and I didn't respond to it). No sweat, I've taken far longer to reply to your e-mails! While I haven't look match at the scheme proposed by Amit, I think there's a flaw with the algorithm: IP

IPv6 addresses not released when routes change

2008-03-03 Thread Kevin Oberman
At a recent networking conference an IPv6 hour took place where IPv6 only was available. It was an interesting experience. On the whole, things worked well, but I hit one problem. When I brought up my system, I associated with the main conference SSID and received an IPv6 address prior to the

Re: Ephemeral ports patch (fixed)

2008-03-03 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote: At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024 to 1. Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the two codepaths side by side, rather than

Re: Ephemeral ports patch (fixed)

2008-03-03 Thread Fernando Gont
At 03:23 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: Too optimistic: ! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535 Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified diff format, I needed to look at it in context format. (Strange, since I usually prefer unified.) Doh! I had

Re: Ephemeral port range (patch)

2008-03-03 Thread Fernando Gont
At 03:37 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: While I haven't look match at the scheme proposed by Amit, I think there's a flaw with the algorithm: IP IDs need to be unique for {source IP, des IP, Protocol}. And the algorithm still keeps a *global* IP ID. That means you'll cycle through