Dear David,
try to enable flow-control at the gig-e switch and freebsd network card.
Kind regards,
ingo flaschberger
geschaeftsleitung
---
netstorage-crossip-flat:fee
powered by
crossip communications gmbh
---
sebastian kneipp gasse 1
SMP DISABLED on my Opteron 2212 (ULE, Preemption on)
Yields ~750kpps in em0 and out em1 (one direction)
I am miffed why this yields more pps than
a) with all 4 cpus running and b) 4 cpus with lagg load balanced over 3
incoming connections so 3 taskq threads
I would be willing to set up test
Dear Paul,
SMP DISABLED on my Opteron 2212 (ULE, Preemption on)
Yields ~750kpps in em0 and out em1 (one direction)
I am miffed why this yields more pps than
a) with all 4 cpus running and b) 4 cpus with lagg load balanced over 3
incoming connections so 3 taskq threads
because less locking,
Ipfw rule was simply allow ip from any to any :)
This is 64bit i'm testing now.. I have a 32 bit install I tested on
another machine but it only has bge NIC and wasn't performing as well
so I'll reinstall 32 bit on this 2212 and test then drop in the
(3ghz) and test.
I still don't like
Dear Paul,
I still don't like the huge hit ipfw and lagg take :/
I think, you can't use fastforward with with lagg.
** I tried polling in UP mode and I got some VERY interesting results..
CPU is 44% idle (idle polling isn't on) but I'm getting errors! It's doing
530kpps with ipfw loaded,
Hi
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Paul,
I still don't like the huge hit ipfw and lagg take :/
You have to try PF, then you will respect IPFW again ;)
-cut-
So my maximum without polling is close to 800kpps but if I push that
it starts locking me from doing things, or
how many kpps do you
2008/7/2 Stefan Lambrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do not know for Paul but, I want to be able to route (and/or bridge to
handle) 600-700mbps syn flood,
which is something like 1500kpps in every direction. Is it unrealistic?
If the code is optimized to fully utilize MP I do not see a reason why quad
At 05:24 AM 7/1/2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am thinking
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html
is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away.
Synopsis: [tcp] RTM_MISS with the transit packets
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net-bz
Responsible-Changed-By: bz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 2 13:52:56 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
My fault most likely, patch out for review already.
Synopsis: [ndis] [patch] ndis network driver sometimes loses network connection
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net-cokane
Responsible-Changed-By: cokane
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 2 14:56:51 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
PR refers to a recent commit of changes that I made, I
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Ingo Flaschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious now... how do you change individual device polling via sysctl?
not via sysctl, via ifconfig:
# enable interface polling
/sbin/ifconfig em0 polling
/sbin/ifconfig em1 polling
/sbin/ifconfig em2 polling
Kian Mohageri wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual rule
inserted is pass on lo0 inet from 123.123.123.123 to
13 matches
Mail list logo
