Hello everyone!
I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
My topology looks like this:
(linux-box #1) --- (em0 - freebsd-gateway - em1) --- (linux-box #2)
I want to send packets from linux-box #1 to linux-box #2 over the free-bsd
gateway.
The problem is that I can see the
Jedrzej Kalinowski wrote:
pluknet pisze:
2009/5/28 Jedrzej Kalinowski kalin...@iem.pw.edu.pl:
Is there any way to configure the bridge to add stp protocol to any
added (via ifconfig bridgeX addm ifX) member interface - so to change
the default behaviour? Or specifying it explicitly is
On Thu, 28 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
shey guys, i've read
s
[SNIP]
s
sin comparison to an intel em.. 32bit, it's linked at a gigabit though.. but no
sheavy traffic there.
s
s--BEGIN WORKING
sIF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 1932426
sIF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 24270520
sIF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15
The following reply was made to PR bin/131365; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vick Khera vi...@khera.org
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/131365: route(8): route add changes interpretation of network
specification [regression]
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:57:13 -0400
I'm not
well, from what im told by snmp people, it's what's happening at that
time, so up and down is normal... but not at the rate that the
non-working one is going. and this one's upload and download are spread
out normallly, 24 mbit out, 2mbit in...
current figures on the messed up system:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
swell, from what im told by snmp people, it's what's happening at that time, so
sup and down is normal... but not at the rate that the non-working one is
sgoing. and this one's upload and download are spread out normallly, 24 mbit
sout, 2mbit in...
s
scurrent
--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Sebastian Mellmann
sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
From: Sebastian Mellmann sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de
Subject: ipfw dummynet queue size limitations
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 4:37 AM
Hi everyone!
I've
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:52 -0700, Barney Cordoba wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Sebastian Mellmann
sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
From: Sebastian Mellmann sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de
Subject: ipfw dummynet queue size limitations
To:
me: is it supposed to be sequential ?
me: from low to high ?
netsnmpguy: no, it's the difference between on poll period to the next
he did admit that he doesn't monitor high speed networks so he can't be
too sure.
ifconfig bce0 -tso
bce0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST
On Fri, 29 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
sme: is it supposed to be sequential ?
sme: from low to high ?
snetsnmpguy: no, it's the difference between on poll period to the next
The value of ifOutOctets is not the difference between poll periods but it
is just the polled value of the octets that are
Is 192.168.7.1 the freebsd gateway? Because that would explain it.
You need to send to the linux box's IP
On 2009-05-29, Sebastian Mellmann
sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
My topology looks like this:
Is 192.168.7.1 the freebsd gateway? Because that would explain it.
You need to send to the linux box's IP
No, 192.168.7.1 is the linux box.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On 2009-05-29, Sebastian Mellmann
sebastian.mellm...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm using
Sebastian Mellmann wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
My topology looks like this:
(linux-box #1) --- (em0 - freebsd-gateway - em1) --- (linux-box #2)
I want to send packets from linux-box #1 to linux-box #2 over the free-bsd
gateway.
Hi everybody.
As far as I know the natt patch hasn't been included in the source tree yet.
This fact notwithstanding, is there a patch I can download and apply
manually? I need it rather badly...
Thanks.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
As far as I know the natt patch hasn't been included in the source tree yet.
This fact notwithstanding, is there a patch I can download and apply
manually? I need it rather badly...
There sure is. bz@ sent this over for
Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Possibly try lagg(4) instead? this supports fec and lacp.
Thanks, I'll try as soon as I'm able...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
The following reply was made to PR kern/135067; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Julian Elischer jul...@elischer.org
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, mjgu...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/135067: [patch] [fib] Incorrect KASSERTs in sys/net/route.c
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:58:48 -0700
if you
17 matches
Mail list logo
