Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2012-04-09 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Randy Bush
new to dummynet FreeBSD dum0.sea.rg.net 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 5 00:53:01 UTC 2012 root@dum0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 dum0# ipfw show 00100 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipoptions ssrr,lsrr,rr 00200 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00300 0

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:07:19PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: new to dummynet FreeBSD dum0.sea.rg.net 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 5 00:53:01 UTC 2012 root@dum0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 dum0# ipfw show 00100 0 0 deny log ip from any to any ipoptions

Re: kern/154850: [netgraph] [patch] ng_ether fails to name nodes when the associated interface contains dots or colons

2012-04-09 Thread st41ker
The following reply was made to PR kern/154850; it has been noted by GNATS. From: st41ker st41...@st41ker.net To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, nde...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/154850: [netgraph] [patch] ng_ether fails to name nodes when the associated interface contains dots or colons Date:

Re: [PATCH] Add 40g media types

2012-04-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, April 05, 2012 5:47:11 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 5. Apr 2012, at 18:47 , John Baldwin wrote: Hi, The patch below adds 40G media types for what I think are the common media types we would see on FreeBSD (could be wrong). One caveat though, we are running awfully

Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).

2012-04-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, April 08, 2012 1:11:25 am Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:22:07PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: Make sure you have any firmware up to the latest available, if that doesn't help let me know and I'll check internally to see if there are any outstanding issues

Re: LACP kernel panics: /* unlocking is safe here */

2012-04-09 Thread Andrew Boyer
Makes sense to me. -Andrew On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:02 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote: On 3 April 2012 00:35, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Friday, March 30, 2012 6:04:24 pm Andrew Boyer wrote: While investigating a LACP issue, I turned on LACP_DEBUG on a debug kernel. In this

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

2012-04-09 Thread enoch
YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:36:12PM -0400, enoch wrote: YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:51:19AM -0400, enoch wrote: YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch

fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3

2012-04-09 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY, CANNOT RUN FAST FSCK Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: CANNOT SET FS_NEEDSFSCK FLAG Apr 9 20:09:22

Re: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3

2012-04-09 Thread Paul A. Procacci
Nothing logged in /var/log/* or crashes that exist in /var/crash would indicate to me some sort of hardware related problem. Have you tested your hardware lately and know that it is in operational order? ~Paul On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:36:54PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: Hi. Apr 9

Re[2]: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3

2012-04-09 Thread Коньков Евгений
Yes, I have tested. and on this hardware on this OS it works from Fri Feb 24 17:07:48 UTC 2012 but last two days: reboot ~ Mon Apr 9 19:50 reboot ~ Mon Apr 9 18:30 reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 20:55

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Randy Bush
dum0# ipfw 900 pipe 1 config queue 20 delay 10ms remove the '900' ipfw pipe 1 config queue 20 delay 10ms thanks! but ... sure, it's not really part of the programmitic sequence. but one can not see it's there! randy dum0# ipfw show 00100 00 deny log ip from any to any ipoptions

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Apr 9, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Randy Bush wrote: dum0# ipfw 900 pipe 1 config queue 20 delay 10ms remove the '900' ipfw pipe 1 config queue 20 delay 10ms thanks! but ... sure, it's not really part of the programmitic sequence. but one can not see it's there! randy dum0# ipfw

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Michael Sierchio
ipfw show (or list) shows rules and their state ipfw pipe showor ipfw queue show yields interesting results. - M ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3

2012-04-09 Thread Eugene Grosbein
10.04.2012 01:36, Коньков Евгений пишет: Hi. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY, CANNOT RUN FAST FSCK Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e:

RE: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet

2012-04-09 Thread Li, Qing
WRT the IF_AFDATA_LOCK() race condition you mentioned, I re-run the tests that I used when I developed that code, but I haven't run into any issues, but that doesn't mean there isn't a bug. Could you please share with me a call path that you believe is problematic, or a simple test case that

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Randy Bush
Try ipfw pipe show instead thanks! now to figure out what all that means. especially worried about the queue length, as will be using varying delays in an experiment. randy ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Randy Bush
Well, you should look at your bandwidth-delay product and adjust the queue size appropriately is there a url for that product? :) do they take paypal? :) understand the math. want tool to do it for me. 'cause it ain't just me, it's lab tech(s). randy

Re: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet

2012-04-09 Thread Ryan Stone
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com wrote: Could you please share with me a call path that you believe is problematic, or a simple test case that uncovers the issue ? I cannot because it is literally impossible for in6_lltable_prefix_free() to ever be called.

Re: dummynet dummy

2012-04-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Apr 9, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Randy Bush wrote: Try ipfw pipe show instead thanks! You're most welcome. now to figure out what all that means. especially worried about the queue length, as will be using varying delays in an experiment. Well, you should look at your bandwidth-delay

RE: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet

2012-04-09 Thread Li, Qing
I have not followed this thread closely from the beginning, so let me confirm. Are you reporting multiple bugs: 1) ndp entries remain after the removal of an address (according to the thread title), and 2) you believe there is a race condition around in6_lltable_prefix_free() but if it can

Re: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet

2012-04-09 Thread Ryan Stone
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com wrote: I have not followed this thread closely from the beginning, so let me confirm. Are you reporting multiple bugs: 1) ndp entries remain after the removal of an address (according to the thread title), and 2) you believe there

Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable

2012-04-09 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:29:55PM -0400, enoch wrote: YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:36:12PM -0400, enoch wrote: YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:51:19AM -0400, enoch wrote: YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com